shoney/writeonce
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
479 commits 8 branches 1 tag 12 MiB
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
shoney.arickathil
c0b0dbb846 docs: audit all markdown against the code, fix findings, flatten status folders 
- README: shipped concurrency/HTTP/WebSockets sat in the roadmap as "not yet
  available"; "no package manager" contradicted [deps]; the deps example
  would not have compiled (the key IS the module name)
- runtime/README: leads with wovm, wo-rt.c demoted to a historical section;
  dropped 2 nonexistent recipes, crates/rt, @gc refcounting, 13 suites -> 18
- employee + log-watcher READMEs claimed "does not compile"; both are gates
- error catalog: +10 emitted codes incl WO-E250, the only diagnostic the
  shipped query surface raises; recorded why the sweep rotted
- language-surface: group-by parses, then the typechecker refuses it
- 00-code-review + 00-link-audit re-run; history kept, not rewritten
- 48 dead Rust-era exploration links de-linked rather than re-pointed (their
  prose names the retired plan by number); successor map -> discarded.md
- 08-project-structure: compiler/plan/ never existed; corpus has 9 dirs, 5 empty
- releasing.md: dropped a --draft step the workflow never had
- new docs/00-doc-audit.md: findings + disposition, incl one row where the
  audit was wrong and the doc it accused was right
- status folders removed: 34 stories flat, status only in frontmatter; 252
  links recomputed from resolved paths; board/board-views/structure retaught
- story 24 -> in-progress, since frontmatter is now the only truth
- new iteration 38: fs mutation verbs + net.connect, the two capability
  families no iteration owned
- new iteration 39: gofiber/fiber v3.5.0 parity study. The ledger called
  CSRF/sessions unblocked by iteration 34's HMAC, but the runtime has no
  source of randomness at all
- linkcheck skips .dev/.superpowers: 0 broken paths, 0 bad anchors

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-26 19:20:22 +02:00
shoney.arickathil
7ca8b178ea docs: plan — chat + actor lifecycle (10 tasks, 5 stages); spec approved 
- stage 1 crypto (ids 85-87, RFC vectors), stage 2 lifecycle (cap +
  WO_T_ACTOR, call kinds 5/6, monitor, time.after — ids 88-90), stage
  3 framework WS (ws_accept + hijack, wsframe codec), stage 4 chat
  sample + 5-check gate, stage 5 closeout
- two spec deviations pre-disclosed: reply-type agreement rule
  (WO-E226 through actor-M erasure), monitor three-argument form
- battery-with-builds-first constraint baked in (stale-binary lesson)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-23 00:28:26 +02:00
shoney.arickathil
9a9da1b41a docs: spec — chat + actor lifecycle (iteration 24 absorbs 31, 34 resolved) 
- one iteration by directive 2026-08-23: call() parks with typed reply
  (envelope kinds 5/6 over the DB-RPC park), mailbox cap 1024 +
  WO_T_ACTOR fail-fast, monitor(addr, msg) one-way, time.after
  one-shot no-cancel
- story 34 resolved: C builtins sha1/sha256/hmac_sha256 over Bytes,
  RFC vectors gated
- WS pure .wo: handler-owned upgrade (ws_accept + hijack sentinel),
  frame codec over Bytes via 36's bitwise, two actors per connection
  (sole-reader + sole-writer)
- chat sample: registry + room actors, python raw-RFC6455 gate —
  cross-shard functional, 1k soak, SIGTERM drain, battery unchanged
- status PROPOSED — awaiting review before the plan

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-23 00:23:58 +02:00