Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
296efb52ed docs(db2-ephemeral): databasev2 2 closes — task 6a contract, forks 1–7, the README sweep
- story 02: `status: done`, `review_pending` (forks 1–7 auto-approved for
  autonomy); progress rows 6a ✅, 6b ➡ databasev2 5 Phase A, 7 `a310496`;
  5c/5d rows cite the `dev` hashes (the pre-merge ones were unreachable);
  task 6a's Given/When/Then met; Info records the seven forks (sentinel over
  `:memory:`, its rules, the refusal contract, startup-only, the budget
  leaves for 5, library-owned tables bind consumers, the v8 table bit);
  History keeps the first cut that refused every class-bearing program
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: "Startup refusal + WO_EPHEMERAL" — contract,
  hatch, table bit, measured blast radius, deferred items, proof; the
  dispatcher paragraph no longer says a failed commit un-applies the row
  (fatal since databasev2 4 part A; WO_T_IO unreachable from a write path)
- residency spec + plan: task 6 items annotated with the 2026-09-09
  decisions; the byte budget marked moved to databasev2 5
- README, seven example READMEs and four guides carry the one-line rule
  (durable default refuses without WO_DATA; WO_EPHEMERAL=1; durable:
  false); shop's RAM-only command sets the sentinel

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2c3531998124042fe736388e8b926abda3841194)
2026-09-15 01:16:24 +02:00
552c129ce3 docs(site-deploy): redeploy runbook for writeonce.de
- new docs/guides/deploying-site.md: build, content refresh, systemd
  unit, post-deploy verification, rollback, and the gaps behind each
  workaround
- leads with the trap that costs the most: shipping a binary does NOT
  update chapters. seed_if_empty only fills an EMPTY table and
  AdminEdit answers not_found for an unknown slug, so a host with an
  existing WO_DATA shows the old chapter list with no error anywhere
- that claim is measured, not argued: a 9-chapter build seeded a data
  dir, then the 10-chapter binary against it still 404'd /ch/storage
  and rendered 9 nav entries; wiping WO_DATA gave 200 and 10
- records two more blockers found while writing it: both site deps
  (porch, writeonce-view) 404 on GitHub and wo.lock is untracked, so
  the site submodule cannot build standalone; and the embedded wovm
  sets the glibc floor (this machine: 2.38, above Ubuntu 22.04's 2.35)
- build recipe run verbatim before publishing; releasing.md points here

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 930a715c4a3d847529e3e341edc71c65a7e11d1c)
2026-08-31 21:54:27 +02:00
7d9d526bb6 refactor(site-submodule): docs/examples/site becomes a submodule
- extracted to github.com/shoneyJ/writeonce-site with `git subtree
  split`, so the site keeps its own 9 commits of history rather than
  landing there as a flattened snapshot
- .gitmodules gains the third entry, alongside reference/writeonce-app
  and reference/writeonce-api; path is unchanged, so every doc and
  script that names docs/examples/site still resolves
- site-accept.sh fails early and says `git submodule update --init`
  when the directory is empty. Without it a clone lacking submodules
  copies an empty app and fails later as a build error naming nothing
- releasing.md: the steps that edit install/view.wo now say that edit
  is a commit in the site repo plus a pointer bump here — editing and
  committing only in this repo would record nothing
- gate re-run against the submodule: site-accept 23 checks, 0 failures

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4b5634801d5379890bad24c8129cfb23ab6b98df)
2026-08-30 22:02:55 +02:00
c0b0dbb846 docs: audit all markdown against the code, fix findings, flatten status folders
- README: shipped concurrency/HTTP/WebSockets sat in the roadmap as "not yet
  available"; "no package manager" contradicted [deps]; the deps example
  would not have compiled (the key IS the module name)
- runtime/README: leads with wovm, wo-rt.c demoted to a historical section;
  dropped 2 nonexistent recipes, crates/rt, @gc refcounting, 13 suites -> 18
- employee + log-watcher READMEs claimed "does not compile"; both are gates
- error catalog: +10 emitted codes incl WO-E250, the only diagnostic the
  shipped query surface raises; recorded why the sweep rotted
- language-surface: group-by parses, then the typechecker refuses it
- 00-code-review + 00-link-audit re-run; history kept, not rewritten
- 48 dead Rust-era exploration links de-linked rather than re-pointed (their
  prose names the retired plan by number); successor map -> discarded.md
- 08-project-structure: compiler/plan/ never existed; corpus has 9 dirs, 5 empty
- releasing.md: dropped a --draft step the workflow never had
- new docs/00-doc-audit.md: findings + disposition, incl one row where the
  audit was wrong and the doc it accused was right
- status folders removed: 34 stories flat, status only in frontmatter; 252
  links recomputed from resolved paths; board/board-views/structure retaught
- story 24 -> in-progress, since frontmatter is now the only truth
- new iteration 38: fs mutation verbs + net.connect, the two capability
  families no iteration owned
- new iteration 39: gofiber/fiber v3.5.0 parity study. The ledger called
  CSRF/sessions unblocked by iteration 34's HMAC, but the runtime has no
  source of randomness at all
- linkcheck skips .dev/.superpowers: 0 broken paths, 0 bad anchors

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 19:20:22 +02:00
72cd510676 ci: workflow_dispatch is a real dry run
- manual runs skip the tag guard (there is no tag on a dispatch, so
  GITHUB_REF_NAME is the branch and the guard always failed) and skip
  publishing
- a dispatch now builds, verifies the digest, smoke-tests the
  extracted toolchain and reports the glibc floor, then stops
- replaces the throwaway-tag rehearsal in the checklist: no tag to
  delete, no draft release to clean up

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 06:01:26 +02:00
c47d91c153 docs(releasing): what the hosted runner costs
- public repos: standard runners free, unlimited minutes; only larger
  (4-core+) runners bill there and this workflow does not use one
- private: included minutes per plan, then per-minute; Linux x1 vs
  Windows x2 / macOS x10; each job rounds up to the next minute
- sized from a measurement: cold mkdist.sh is 3.4s on 20 cores, so
  under a minute on a 2-core runner — setup-ocaml dominates, ~3-10
  min per release, and it only runs on a tag
- release assets do not count against Actions artifact storage
- flags that rates drift; check the billing page

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 05:23:33 +02:00
3dcadefbfd docs(releasing): why the release job stays on a hosted runner
- self-hosted works technically: outbound HTTPS only, no inbound
  ports, honours HTTPS_PROXY/NO_PROXY — a box behind a proxy is fine
- but it defeats the pinned-runner decision: the build host sets the
  glibc floor, so a workstation runner (2.39 here) puts it back to
  2.38+ and drops Ubuntu 22.04 / Debian 12 / RHEL 9
- and a workstation-built release is unattested
- records what self-hosting accepts: jobs run as the starting user,
  with that user's ~/.ssh, credentials and network reach — including
  hosts named in ~/.ssh/config; worst on public repos, where a
  stranger's PR runs code on the runner
- if unavoidable: dedicated VM, unprivileged user, --ephemeral,
  segmented network, treat .credentials as a secret

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 05:16:43 +02:00
a705622f4a docs(releasing): first-time pipeline readiness checklist
- states plainly what does NOT trigger it: builds run on a
  GitHub-hosted runner, not locally, and only on a `v*` tag push —
  pushing master releases nothing
- 14 numbered steps: get the workflow onto GitHub, enable Actions,
  allow ocaml/setup-ocaml, the 403/workflow-permissions fallback,
  a --draft rehearsal on a throwaway tag, cleanup, then the real tag
- calls out that the rehearsal tag is EXPECTED to fail the tag/VERSION
  guard, and how to rehearse the full job instead
- step 8/9: read the runner's glibc floor and reconcile
  install/view.wo with it — the runner, not the dev machine, decides
  who can run the release
- lists the three likely first-run failures

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 05:04:39 +02:00
463f897e5f ci: release workflow — no gh auth login, tag-triggered
- .github/workflows/release.yml: builds, verifies and publishes on a
  `v*` tag. `permissions: contents: write` on the injected
  GITHUB_TOKEN replaces `gh auth login`; no PAT, nothing to rotate
- runs-on ubuntu-22.04 DELIBERATELY: the build host's glibc caps which
  symbol versions the binaries import, and that cap is the floor every
  user needs. 22.04 (2.35) includes Ubuntu 22.04 / Debian 12 / RHEL 9;
  24.04 (2.39) would exclude them
- guards that fail instead of publishing: tag vs VERSION, produced
  asset name vs the filename /install links, sha256, and a smoke test
  that builds a hello project with the binaries INSIDE the tarball
- reports the shipped glibc floor so the claim on /install is checkable
  from a build log
- releasing.md: pipeline route up front, manual route kept; GH_TOKEN
  recipe for non-GitHub CI

Not run — this repo has no CI history and Actions cannot execute
locally. Every guard's shell was dry-run here against the real dist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 04:58:40 +02:00
844bcc1067 docs(releasing): full gh auth login section
- gh's credential is separate from git's: SSH keys let you push but
  not call the API, so a machine that pushes can still fail to release
- the five interactive prompts and what to answer, with SSH as the
  protocol to match this repo's existing remote
- headless path: PAT scopes (classic repo/read:org/gist, fine-grained
  Contents: read and write), --with-token from a 600 file, GH_TOKEN
  for automation
- verify with `gh repo view shoneyJ/writeonce` — proves the token
  reaches THIS repo, not just that it is valid

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 04:54:57 +02:00
b11f964eec docs: release runbook — build, verify, publish on GitHub
- docs/guides/releasing.md: the steps from `just dist` to a working
  download button
- pins the constraint that matters: the asset filename and tag must
  match the URL /install links, or the button 404s
- includes verifying the tarball with the binaries INSIDE it, tagging
  the built commit, `gh release create` with both files, the web-UI
  path, and a curl check of the exact link the site uses
- notes dist/ is gitignored, the shoneyJ/shoneyj path-case difference,
  and what a version bump must touch in install/view.wo

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 04:51:14 +02:00