2 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
shoney.arickathil	7ca8b178ea	docs: plan — chat + actor lifecycle (10 tasks, 5 stages); spec approved ... - stage 1 crypto (ids 85-87, RFC vectors), stage 2 lifecycle (cap + WO_T_ACTOR, call kinds 5/6, monitor, time.after — ids 88-90), stage 3 framework WS (ws_accept + hijack, wsframe codec), stage 4 chat sample + 5-check gate, stage 5 closeout - two spec deviations pre-disclosed: reply-type agreement rule (WO-E226 through actor-M erasure), monitor three-argument form - battery-with-builds-first constraint baked in (stale-binary lesson) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 00:28:26 +02:00
shoney.arickathil	9a9da1b41a	docs: spec — chat + actor lifecycle (iteration 24 absorbs 31, 34 resolved) ... - one iteration by directive 2026-08-23: call() parks with typed reply (envelope kinds 5/6 over the DB-RPC park), mailbox cap 1024 + WO_T_ACTOR fail-fast, monitor(addr, msg) one-way, time.after one-shot no-cancel - story 34 resolved: C builtins sha1/sha256/hmac_sha256 over Bytes, RFC vectors gated - WS pure .wo: handler-owned upgrade (ws_accept + hijack sentinel), frame codec over Bytes via 36's bitwise, two actors per connection (sole-reader + sole-writer) - chat sample: registry + room actors, python raw-RFC6455 gate — cross-shard functional, 1k soak, SIGTERM drain, battery unchanged - status PROPOSED — awaiting review before the plan Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 00:23:58 +02:00