- re-analyzed every story/spec/plan markdown for dependency statements
- added: iteration 17's OUTGOING edge (framework internal/ reorg + check
mode, WO-E108/E109 reserved); 1-6 foundation anchor; 9b -> 10 ("service
blocks want query results"); 14's gap fan-out node; post-12 parked
drain cluster with dashed scope-directive edges (13 + drain are
directive-held, not technically blocked)
- new graph 2: the concurrency chain — 8/9f/11 and EVERYTHING they gate:
keep-alive parking retirement, h2c, body/response streaming + commit
point, cancellation, pub/sub+WS, 9c's rejected async-statement
alternative, schedulable idle timeouts, fiber jobs (+18),
cancellation->rollback (+18+cancel)
- graph 3 notes 9d's keypair crypto is its own C impl, neither waits for
nor feeds the crypto-fork gate; storage-integration rows point at
their real owners (future migrations story, 9-series query surface)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- docs/00-dependency-graph.md: three mermaid graphs — story iterations
(hard edges only; 18 is the only spec-approved node with all
prerequisites green), framework v1 ledger items (three recurring
gates: net seams, crypto fork, iterations 8/11; nine slices startable
today in any order), framework v2 internals (cache/flags independent,
transaction{} is the critical path, jobs compose on it)
- maintenance rule: node classes update in the same change as board rows
- board links the graph up top; spec 18 banner -> APPROVED, plan next
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
