databasev2 4 part A, task 4. Scope extended with developer approval: the
plan authorised touching the sample only for observability, but no
existing leg has enough concurrent durable writes to exercise group
commit at all, so the payoff was unevaluable either way.
The finding that forced it:
- `mix` writes on one op in ten with C=4 (all_mode calls mix_mode(n/10,
4); Mixer writes on i % 10 == 9), so the quick run performs 20 writes
total. Measured mean batch 1.01 over 3112 barriers, peak 3
- that is a property of the WORKLOAD, not the mechanism: peak 3 of a
possible 4 shows batches form whenever writes actually coincide
- `wmix N C` added: every op a durable write, C at once. Updates rather
than inserts, so it is comparable to mixwrite and the row count stays
flat. Histogram kind 2 — a replayed store still holds the seeding run's
kind-0/1 Hist rows and merging those would report someone else's
latencies
- WO_WAL_STATS=1 prints one line at exit: batches, records, peak_batch,
peak_staged. Opt-in, because it would otherwise pollute every durable
program's output. Counters live in wo_wal; no builtin, the numbers are
diagnostic and not part of the language
Measured, and it scales with concurrency exactly as designed:
- C = 4 / 16 / 64 -> mean batch 1.13 / 1.76 / 5.35, peak 3 / 10 / 39
- the gate's own legs: durable.s1 5412 records over 5412 barriers (mean
1.0, peak 1 — the inline path, one barrier per statement BY DESIGN),
durable.sN 7757 over 2296 (mean 3.38, peak 28) at 2x the throughput
- peak staged 1372 B settles the no-cap decision with a number: the batch
is tiny, so the upstream mailbox bound is sufficient
- mean_batch/peak_batch are higher-is-better (the default detector would
have called bigger batches worse)
- only the batch SHAPE metrics are waived to 100%; wmix throughput and
latency keep real tolerances (15% s1, 50% sN) — a blanket waiver would
have left the entire new leg ungated
- the live assertion `mean > 1.0` on the sN leg is what catches inertness
- gate bites: sN wmix ops_sec -60% -> FAIL on exactly that metric, 1 of 86
Verified: db-bench-quick 89 checks 0 failures; baseline refreshed (86
metrics).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Mixer actors: 90/10 read/write, per-actor histograms merged through
the store itself (Hist rows) — exact aggregate percentiles
- msgrate: one-way flood at a worker-placed sink; measured 15.3M
msgs/s same-heap vs 2.06M cross-shard — the mutex-inbox number
- finding: point lookups are O(table) (probe walks all slabs), so
read-heavy mix is quadratic in store size — all-mode calibrated to
N/10 mix ops; the number 22 exists to publish
- TSan clean both shard counts (setarch -R, fibers-gate pattern)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- seed/read/query/write/wal/verify/verify-acked + all (one-process
campaign: RAM store dies with the process)
- per-op time.ticks, 1us-bucket histogram percentiles (reservoir
deviation: no element-write/sort in language; better tail anyway)
- Meta expectation rows ride the same WAL verify checks
- finding: hand-built multi<TableClass> SEGVs on drop (elems classed
OWNED, refs are scalar ids) — worked around, recorded
- finding: reads ~1.6k/s p50 595us vs 287k/s inserts — probe walks
all slabs; the number 22 exists to surface
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
