Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
02b4b13a52 Merge master into db-residency-doctrine — and close the two half-exposed features
The branch was 17 ahead / 25 behind with 11 conflicting files, and drifting
further: db.c had been rewritten twice on master since (group commit, then
compaction). Resolved rather than rebased so both histories stay legible.

Conflicts, and how each was settled:

- db.c: BOTH semantics kept. Master's fatal path and compaction check now sit
  behind the branch's `table_is_durable` predicate, in all three inline arms —
  a volatile table reaches neither the barrier nor the compaction check
- db-bench sample: every mode from both sides (growth, growth-verify, randread,
  replayseed, wmix) and ONE `boot` mode, which both sides had added
  independently
- db-bench.py: all six legs kept. Both sides had also grown the same
  WAL-size helper under different names; collapsed into one
- perf-targets: the branch's §5 (RAM ceiling) then master's §6/§7 — master's
  numbering had already assumed a §5 it did not have
- story frontmatter: master's `status` (the landing truth) plus the branch's
  `readiness` axis. 03 would have read `done` + `refine`, which is a
  contradiction — it was brainstormed and landed on master, so `ready`
- board: both standup blocks newest-first; master's chain rows (a superset);
  the branch's databasev2 1-2 rows with master's 3-4. Fixed a stray `|` in
  master's row 3
- baseline: master's, then REGENERATED from a full campaign — 143 metrics,
  132 checks, 0 failures with both sides' legs present

TWO HALF-EXPOSED FEATURES FIXED, because the merge rule is that master gets
no feature that is honoured in name only:

- `resident: keys` PARSED, set a .wob flag, and did nothing: rows stayed fully
  resident. A developer could declare a 120 GB table keys-resident, watch it
  compile, and be OOM-killed. The loader now REFUSES it with a message naming
  what to write instead, until tasks 5c/5d land. The compiler still parses it
  and its AST golden still passes, so the grammar work stays tested
- `durable: false` was honoured ONLY on the inline path. wo_db_exec_req had no
  guard at all, so a volatile table written from an actor on a worker shard
  would still be logged — precisely porch's session-table case, and precisely
  what iteration 2 exists to provide. All three request-path arms now carry the
  same predicate. Found by reading the merged code, not by a test: the obvious
  probe runs main() on the primary and therefore only exercises the inline path

Verified on the merged tree: wovm-test 0, woc-test 0, oop-e2e 122/0,
residency-accept 8/0, db-bench 132/0, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 10:14:25 +02:00
8b29eb492c docs(db): T6 closeout — checkpoint documented, chain's last link lands
databasev2 3, task 6. Documentation, plus three gate-tolerance
corrections that are justified rather than silent.

- 04-db-binding.md: the NORMATIVE rule — compaction may run only where
  nothing is staged (a correctness requirement, not scheduling), recovery
  is unchanged, and a failed compaction is a missed optimisation rather
  than a durability event
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: why one file and not snapshot-plus-tail
  (Postgres CANNOT compact — page deltas; ours are full row images, so a
  compacted log IS a store), why rename is the whole crash-safety story,
  why the dump flushes but does NOT fsync when it does, why the
  replacement is preallocated, and where the trigger is checked
- README: the checkpoint knobs, the extended walstats line, the boot mode
- story -> status: done, with criteria split met/outstanding
- board: standup entry in the six-question shape, both rows rewritten

THE OBLIGATION IS AT THE COMPACTOR, not only in a spec: compaction moves
every record, so it invalidates every WAL offset iteration 2's
`resident: keys` stores, and the loop that knows each record's new
position must rebuild that map. Nothing fails today because that storage
half is unimplemented — it would fail later, looking like corruption.

Board claim corrected before it shipped: I wrote that the concurrency
chain is "complete". It is not — chain 5 stays in-progress because
databasev2 4's part B was never done and its premise was invalidated by
part A. Every link has landed its PLANNED work; that is a different
statement.

Gate tolerances, each with the measurement that justifies it:

- ckpt.pause_us_max is no longer gated relatively. The raw pause scales
  with the live set and this workload's live set is not fixed (wmix's
  hist_dump inserts a row per latency bucket), so gating it gates the
  box. Added ckpt.pause_us_per_mb — the engine's own rate, gated for
  real, and the metric that would have caught the 8x dump regression —
  with the absolute 50ms budget still guarding the raw pause
- ram.*.msgrate 15% -> 70%. PRE-EXISTING, and measured: 10.7M-17.9M
  msgs/sec across ten full runs, several predating this work — a 1.67x
  spread against a 15% gate
- durable.sN.*.p99us 100% -> 300%, with more evidence than the first
  widening: mixread 1043/2318/4147us, mixwrite 1623/4446us on the same
  build. Floors stay the real guard and are not slack

Battery: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail, woc-test, oop-e2e 119/0,
db-bench 117 checks 0 failures, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 06:48:34 +02:00
40d56c4664 perf(wal): checkpoint measured — 2.16x space, 1.78x boot, 2.7ms pause — T5
databasev2 3, task 5.

Full campaign, same workload twice, differing only in whether
checkpointing may fire:

- WAL used 1962358 -> 907094 bytes (2.16x reclaimed)
- boot 114 -> 64 ms (1.78x), median of 3
- stop-the-world pause max 2651us against a STATED 50ms budget

The budget is asserted, not assumed: 50ms is a stall a serving process
can absorb without a client seeing a timeout, and the leg fails if it is
exceeded. The pause is O(live rows) — at ~181 MB/s a 1GB live set implies
~5.5s, which is the number an incremental design must be bought against.
The spec deliberately did not buy it in advance.

FOUND BY MEASURING: the dump was 8x slower than it needed to be. It
flushed through wo_wal_commit, which fdatasyncs, so it paid one barrier
per 256 records. Intermediate durability there is worthless — the temp is
not authoritative until the rename and is fsynced once immediately before
it. With a single final barrier:

- ~107KB live: 23948us -> 2903us
- ~500KB live: 36361us -> 7526us
- ~1.98MB live: 107649us -> 13212us
- marginal ~22 MB/s -> ~181 MB/s, sync-bound to bandwidth-bound

Correctness re-proven after that change: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail,
test_wal 760 pass including the 40-round kill-during-compaction battery.

Two measurement defects of my own, fixed rather than reported:

- boot measured through the driver's run() helper reported 251ms both
  with and without checkpointing — run() samples RSS on a 250ms poll, so
  every timing floors at the quantum. Measured directly instead, median
  of 3
- ckpt.reclaim_x was recorded as lower-is-better by the default detector,
  which would have PASSED "reclaimed nothing" and FAILED an improvement:
  the feature's central claim, gated backwards. Now higher-is-better,
  gated at 15% while the wall-clock metrics stay wide — waiving them all
  would have left the leg ungated, part A's task 4 mistake

- sample gains a `boot` mode that does nothing, so boot time is boot time
- walstats now reports compactions, pause max/total and compacted bytes
- baseline refreshed from the FULL campaign (N=20000, crash_reps=3), and
  a fresh full run passes 116 checks 0 failures
- gate bites: reclaim_x doctored to 1.0 -> FAIL on exactly that metric

One flake seen and checked, not papered over: durable.sN.query.ops_sec
failed once at 53% below baseline. It is a read-only metric that touches
no WAL code, and a re-run passed 116/0 with the box at load 1.85.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 06:20:13 +02:00
0b618ace19 docs+fix(db): T6 closeout — and reads no longer wait for the barrier
databasev2 4 part A, task 6. Mostly documentation, plus one real fix the
full battery caught.

THE FIX. The drain held EVERY DB reply until the barrier — including
reads, which stage nothing and have no stake in durability. That parked
readers behind an fsync for no reason: durable.sN.mixread.p99 rose from
~1043us to 4057us. Only a statement that actually staged a record now has
its reply held. Caught by the gate, not by review.

THE TRADE, recorded rather than smoothed over. What remains is inherent: a
barrier blocks the owner shard LONGER (more records per fsync) though LESS
OFTEN, so anything queued behind one waits. Three full runs of the same
build gave durable.sN.mixread.p99 of 1043 / 2318 / 4147us and wmix.p99 of
8758 / 20000us — a 2-4x spread with the box near idle. So part A buys ~3x
write throughput at the cost of a longer, noisier tail on the owner shard,
and that is the strongest argument for part B (submit and keep serving).

- durable.sN.*.p99us tolerance widened to 100% WITH the reason in the
  code: a 2-4x-variable tail gated at 50% gates the disk, not the engine.
  The floor is the real guard and is not slack — mixread's (4172us) came
  within 25us of tripping on the worst run. Baseline refreshed; a fresh
  full run then passed 106 checks 0 failures

EXIT STATUS MOVED 3 -> 74 (sysexits EX_IOERR). 3 and 4 are already used by
SAMPLES for their own meanings — db-bench's own `verify` exits 3 on a
checksum mismatch, and it is the gate that exercises durability, so a
durability abort exiting 3 would have been indistinguishable from the
mismatch it should help diagnose. The low range belongs to programs.

Docs:

- story: progress, the payoff measured two ways, the cost side, criteria
  split met/outstanding, and a "part B — its premise changed" section:
  it was justified by "close the 66x gap", but that gap is two problems
  and only the concurrent one was a batching problem
- board: standup entry in the six-question shape; both databasev2 4 rows
  rewritten. They had said "close the 66x gap" — recorded as MIS-STATED
  rather than quietly renumbered
- 00-wob-format.md and 04-db-binding.md: the normative failure contract
  ("a failed WAL commit traps WO_T_IO after un-applying the row") was
  false; corrected, along with the tick-scoped group commit that never
  happened
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: where the barrier runs and why there, why
  replies are held, why the inline path is asymmetric, the one failure
  rule, and how to measure it
- db-bench README: the wmix mode, the env knobs, and the tmpfs warning

Battery: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail, woc-test, oop-e2e 119/0,
db-bench 106/0, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 16:48:23 +02:00
6183a67dfc perf(db): group commit measured — ~2.9x durable write throughput, T5
databasev2 4 part A, task 5.

Controlled before/after — same machine, same workload (wmix 4000 32),
same build except db.c and vm.c, two runs each interleaved:

- per-statement barrier: 2213 / 2177 ops/sec, p50 7183 / 7251us
- group commit:          6216 / 6525 ops/sec, p50 3458 / 3444us
- ~2.9x throughput, ~2.1x lower p50

The full campaign confirms it a second way: s1 takes the inline path and
commits per statement BY DESIGN, so within one build the shard configs are
batching-off vs batching-on — 1467 -> 5117 ops/sec, mean batch 1.0 -> 5.43,
peak 1 -> 57. 3.5x, agreeing with the 2.9x above.

Recorded honestly:

- the BEFORE p99 is at the histogram ceiling (hist_add clamps at 20000us
  and both runs pinned there), so the true figure is >=20ms and unknown.
  The improvement is AT LEAST 2.3x; the old p99 was off the instrument
- durable.sN.mixwrite went 480 -> 492 ops/sec, i.e. UNCHANGED. That was
  the spec's original payoff metric and correcting it was part of the
  brainstorm: mix performs 20 writes at C=4, mean batch 1.01. A workload
  that never has two writes in flight cannot be helped by batching them
- seed is likewise unchanged: a serial writer has nothing to batch with
- so the payoff is real but CONDITIONAL — it appears where concurrent
  durable writes fan into the owner shard, and nowhere else

Two traps recorded in perf-targets §6:

- do not benchmark durability on /tmp: it is tmpfs here, where fdatasync
  is free. The same run reported 195000 ops/sec at p50 1us there against
  2200 at p50 7200us on ext4 — no barrier to amortise, so the measurement
  measures nothing. db-bench keeps its stores under bench/ for this reason
- the record count is not the update count: 7755 records for 4000 updates,
  because hist_dump and the done-marker are themselves durable inserts

- FIXED a regression I introduced in T4: master's committed baseline is
  FULL mode (N=20000, crash_reps=3, msg_n=200000) and I had overwritten it
  with quick-mode values. Regenerated from a full campaign; the full run
  now passes 106 checks 0 failures against it
- gate still bites: sN wmix ops_sec -70% -> FAIL on exactly that metric

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 09:54:52 +02:00
5b1a8c96a1 feat(db-bench): replay baseline — boot cost tracks history, not data
Closes the last gap in databasev2 1; gives databasev2 3 its "before".

- `boot` mode: does NOTHING. WO_DATA replay runs before main, so a mode
  with no work measures replay plus a fixed startup
- `replayseed N M`: N inserts + M updates — same live rows, longer log
- `replay` leg: empty-store startup floor measured and SUBTRACTED, then
  two shapes timed, median of 3 boots each
- premise check: updates must actually append WAL records, else the two
  shapes are one measurement and the penalty means nothing
- WAL bytes = non-zero prefix, never file size (fallocate'd to 1 MiB)
- per-record cost stored in NANOseconds: as us it rounded 5.5 and 5.3 to
  6 and 5, too coarse for the number a checkpoint exists to improve
- 148 checks, 0 failures; gate bites on a doctored ns_per_record

Measured — same 20 000 live rows, different history:

- 20 000 records:  980 035 B WAL, 110 ms replay, 5.5 us/record
- 40 000 records: 1 960 035 B WAL, 211 ms replay, 5.3 us/record
- 1.9x boot cost for an IDENTICAL dataset; per-record cost flat, so
  replay is linear in records not rows
- extrapolated: 10M records ~55 s of boot, 100M ~9 min

- databasev2 3 correction: it planned to use "22's aged-store replay
  numbers", which never existed — 22 proved restart correctness, never
  timed it
- databasev2 3 hazard recorded: compaction rewrites the log and moves
  every record, so it invalidates every `resident: keys` offset — an
  arbitrary byte in a rewritten file, not stale-but-readable
- databasev2 1 -> status: done

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 21:25:24 +02:00
a873cf7331 feat(db-bench): random-read-over-cap leg — the 273x collapse
- `randread N R` in the sample: fill N rows, read R across the WHOLE range
- Weyl order `i*2654435761 mod n` — no RNG in the language, none needed;
  both legs read the SAME key order so residency is the only variable
- `randread` driver leg: control (256 MiB, does not bind) vs over-cap
  (6 MiB + swap), sizes kept modest — quick resolves it in ~5s
- gates the RATIO, not the absolutes: over-cap reads/sec belongs to the
  box's swap device, the factor between two runs belongs to the engine
- reads must all resolve (hits == R) or the leg fails; a collapse measured
  over unresolved reads is noise
- 133 checks, 0 failures; gate bites on a doctored collapse_x

Measured — this closes the gap the swap leg left:

- resident 1 851 166 reads/sec, p50 0us p99 1us
- over-cap    6 771 reads/sec, p50 128us p99 487us
- 273x throughput, ~480x p99, all 20 000 reads resolving in both
- so the two access patterns sit ~270x apart under identical pressure:
  append-mostly insert ~1%, random read 273x
- departure is a STEP not a curve (1us -> 487us, nothing between), which
  is why p99_departure_decile finds no knee — there is none

- caveat recorded, NOT inherited: this is demand-paged anonymous memory
  through swap (4 KiB/fault, no readahead). `resident: keys` preads via
  the page cache — should be better, but databasev2 2 task 7 must measure
  its own read path. New criterion added there

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 20:56:19 +02:00
0c9b2c45d8 feat(db-bench): measure the RAM ceiling — databasev2 1
- `Wide` text-heavy reference shape beside Int-only `Item`
- `growth N int|text`: per-decile RSS read from own /proc/self/status
- `growth-verify`: survivor of a crash must be a contiguous intact prefix
- four footprint legs under a rootless cgroup v2 cap, swap on/off
- `ceiling` leg: die at the cap, then replay must come back intact
- footprint read as median-of-marginals; doublings a separate metric
- 121 checks, 0 failures; footprint gated ±10%, kill-timing ±100%

Measured, and it inverted two of the iteration's own predictions:

- footprint 96.5-100 B/row Int vs 320.6-324 B/row text = 3.3x, NOT the
  "order of magnitude" three docs asserted
- table storage has NO checked ceiling: SIGKILL signal 9, not a catchable
  WO_T_OOM. overcommit lets malloc succeed; kernel kills on page touch
- swap is NOT latency collapse: 900k rows 148s capped-with-swap vs 150s
  uncapped. Append-mostly never re-touches cold pages
- ack-after-fsync survives an OOM kill: ~40k rows, no holes, no corruption
- iteration 2's budget dependency is REMOVED not satisfied — there is no
  "swap onset" to derive a fraction from

- fix: subprocess returncode -9 was labelled a "checked refusal"; 137 is
  the shell spelling of the same signal

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 20:18:47 +02:00
a8829232dc docs: perf-targets register — measured optimization candidates
- target 1: write path (update-through-query re-probe, triple index
  walk, per-field encode, whole-row WAL update record) — re-measure
  after 23, then decide
- targets 2-4 recorded with owners (DB-RPC by design/24, mutex inbox
  /31, fsync bound /23)
- board pending + comparison README link the register

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 17:19:46 +02:00