- story 02: `status: done`, `review_pending` (forks 1–7 auto-approved for
autonomy); progress rows 6a ✅, 6b ➡ databasev2 5 Phase A, 7 `a310496`;
5c/5d rows cite the `dev` hashes (the pre-merge ones were unreachable);
task 6a's Given/When/Then met; Info records the seven forks (sentinel over
`:memory:`, its rules, the refusal contract, startup-only, the budget
leaves for 5, library-owned tables bind consumers, the v8 table bit);
History keeps the first cut that refused every class-bearing program
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: "Startup refusal + WO_EPHEMERAL" — contract,
hatch, table bit, measured blast radius, deferred items, proof; the
dispatcher paragraph no longer says a failed commit un-applies the row
(fatal since databasev2 4 part A; WO_T_IO unreachable from a write path)
- residency spec + plan: task 6 items annotated with the 2026-09-09
decisions; the byte budget marked moved to databasev2 5
- README, seven example READMEs and four guides carry the one-line rule
(durable default refuses without WO_DATA; WO_EPHEMERAL=1; durable:
false); shop's RAM-only command sets the sentinel
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2c3531998124042fe736388e8b926abda3841194)
- explains replay, the row chain, how a checkpoint flattens it, and why
replay of a long chain is quadratic
- worked SKU example with the actual record layout and back-pointers,
and a trace of the fold showing first-seen-wins
- states plainly why the checkpoint does not bound the hot-row case:
both triggers are ratios over the whole log and nothing counts
per-row chain length
- records the bounded-memory vs linear-time conflict behind the O(N^2)
replay rather than presenting it as an oversight
- closes with the reviewing lesson, since this shape survived several
rounds: complexity bugs hide in the caller's loop, not in the linear
helper being read
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit e6434403d566b5d72a24e9c0dcad1f25a2c16320)
