Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
2a4c304378 docs: stories foldered by state — done/ and refine/
- done/ (11): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7b, 9, 9b, 15, 16 — landed iterations
  (9/9b remainders live in the post-12 drain list, not in the files)
- refine/ (8): 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, 9g, 11, 13, 14 — everything marked
  "no spec yet / brainstorm before planning"
- root keeps: 00-story (index), 05 (partial, plan 8 open), 8/10/12
  (specs or plans exist), 17 (parked, spec+plan approved), 18 (next)
- every cross-reference re-pathed and VERIFIED resolving: board, specs,
  plans, employee-list README, story table, intra-story links (moved
  files' relative links deepened one level; done/7b's 9e pointer now
  crosses to refine/)
- pre-existing dead link noted, not touched: refine/11-fibers.md points
  at docs/plan/exploration/fibers/00-fibers.md which does not exist
  (predates the move)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 04:33:24 +02:00
1749440351 docs: borrow/GC analysis for the database engine, into the iterations
- 9b spec gains section 6 "Ownership, borrows, and GC across the
  engine boundary": two one-way copy gates (no VM pointer enters a
  row, everything a select returns is copied out), so the collector
  never traces engine memory and the engine never touches refcounts
- row views are borrows WITHOUT a runtime net: rows share the VM's
  field encoding but not its header, so no borrow word backs them --
  the compile-time escape rule is load-bearing alone
- cursor stability settled: scans materialize their id list before
  the body, row updates through the view stay legal (raise mode
  updates an indexed column mid-scan and is the proving fixture),
  insert/delete on a table with an open cursor is a new WO-E5xx
- GC-pause interaction recorded: collector runs between statements,
  a long scan delays slices -- accepted, documented
- iteration-7b ordering constraint: GC inference must classify before
  table-field validation, diagnostic names the inference reason --
  noted in 7b story, iteration-9 plan constraints, 9b plan tasks
- stories 09/09b Info sections point at the analysis; 9b plan Tasks
  3/5 carry the enforceable checkboxes (ASan boundary assertion)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-15 09:57:53 +02:00
5943bf6890 docs: iteration 9b spec + plan — @table, relations, query (employee)
- spec settles 9b's three forks: SQL/Cypher layer superseded as the
  program surface (design history + wo-db engine-semantics reference);
  comprehension syntax desugared at compile time (no function values);
  System.Linq = operator vocabulary + edge cases, PostgreSQL = execution
  + integrity vocabulary (both references surveyed 2026-08-15)
- aggregate semantics normative: count/sum total 0 on empty, avg/min/max
  are ?T with nil (empty is data, not a fault); nil skipped; sum wraps
  like language arithmetic; GroupBy lowers as group-and-reduce
  (AggregateBy shape), transition/finalize ABI from nodeAgg
- relations: ref = FK with direct-index-probe check (nil passes,
  unchanged-key skips), backlink = secondary-index scan, delete is
  restrict-only; nil never joins, nil is a legal group key
- lowering: the compiler is the planner — queries become bytecode loops
  over cursor/group builtins, longest-prefix index selection, no plan
  tree, no SQL text in the image (disassembly-provable)
- plan: 6 tasks gated by a new docs/examples/employee sample
  (Department/Employee, @unique, composite index, ref/backlink,
  GroupBy report mode) with its own acceptance script + crash step;
  blocked on iteration 9's engine plan
- story 09b + status board updated; 02-wo-language.md carries the
  supersession note

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-15 09:10:08 +02:00