Code is the source of truth; these claims no longer matched runtime/src:
- "net.connect does not exist" — landed 2026-09-07 (id 110); net.connect_tls /
read_tls / write_tls (115-117) + net.accept_tls (118), WO_B_MAX 118. Fixed
in jarvis 00-story (problem statement + architecture + out-of-scope), porch
00-story (proxy middleware row), rv2 7 (push-collector fork), 00-code-review
- "TLS: none / proxy-mandated forever" — retired by rv2 9 (in-process TLS both
directions). Fixed in porch + web-app + site example READMEs (proxy is now a
deployment choice; HSTS row), 00-code-review
- "no RNG anywhere in the runtime" — imprecise: the runtime has a getrandom(2)
source since rv2 9 (TLS ephemerals), but nothing exposes it to .wo yet.
Fixed in CODE-LOGIC (digests), lang 34, porch 2, status lang-39 row
- "porch 9 blocked on language 41" — lang 41 fixed 63065ff. Fixed in porch 1,
jarvis 00-story, status NEXT PLAN, dependency graph (L41 done, P9 ready)
- dependency graph §7 rewritten: the runtime side is done; jarvis 1 waits only
on porch (developer's porch-first order). Adds jarvis 1's dependency table +
the build order that satisfies it
- 00-code-review: a dated 2026-09-09 re-verification appended (record kept)
- site README lives in the writeonce-site submodule: committed there, pointer
bumped here
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit f1049dd9b7c7770da28bcabfc1cb1324621e7ee6)
- five forks locked: cookies: multi SetCookie beside unchanged headers
map; bare-name random_bytes(n)->Bytes; structural-400 in parse_request
+ on-demand cookie() helper; base64(value).base64(mac) signing;
app-supplied key, no middleware (that is iteration 3)
- validated against .dev/reference/fiber (v3, 3ca9a9d): exactly ONE
language enhancement needed (the CSPRNG); repeated Set-Cookie, cookie
attributes, parsing and signing all map to existing primitives
- corrects phase A registry: random_bytes joins the crypto-family
bare-name table (emit.ml b_* + types.ml), NOT wob.h's module enum;
next free id 84/90, not 110
- board: story 2 marked ready, porch-2 row rewritten off the stale
wob.h/110 claim
(cherry picked from commit 4d31d5359436496aed40cb25611abc7ccd4d7875)
- `readiness: ready | refine` is a SECOND axis, orthogonal to status.
`ready` = the brainstorm is complete and the decisions are LOCKED (a spec
approved, or the forks explicitly confirmed). `refine` = open forks remain
and it cannot be planned yet
- `status: refine` RETIRED because it carried both meanings at once, so a held
iteration with an approved spec (language 18, 26) was indistinguishable from
one nobody had thought about. status is now purely where the WORK is:
done | in-progress | pending | hold — `pending` was already the board's own
rendering word, so nothing new was invented
- all 47 iterations classified from EVIDENCE in their own text, not by guess:
"the four forks are SETTLED" / "spec + plan approved" / "Approved spec:" for
ready; "Forks the spec must settle" / "no spec exists yet" for refine. Every
shipped iteration is ready by definition. 19 done, 5 in-progress, 15
pending, 8 hold; 27 ready, 20 refine
- two iterations moved refine -> in-progress rather than -> pending: language
31 and 34 are absorbed into 24 and work on them is literally happening, which
the board already showed as 🔄 while their frontmatter said otherwise. That
disagreement is now gone
- board legend, board-views' frontmatter contract, and two new Dataview
queries updated — the useful one being `readiness: ready AND status:
pending`, the startable set
WHAT THE NEW AXIS IMMEDIATELY SURFACED: of 15 pending iterations, exactly ONE
is startable — databasev2 4, io_uring group-commit, whose forks were confirmed
settled 2026-08-20. Everything else pending needs a brainstorm first. That was
invisible while one key carried both meanings, and it is now on the board.
Also caught by the sweep, unrelated to readiness but found by cross-checking
frontmatter against the board: SIX duplicate rows. Every iteration moved into
databasev2 was still listed in the LANGUAGE pending table under its retired id
(23, 32, 33, 20, 21, 27) as well as its new one. Stale copies removed. And two
databasev2 rows made claims the sweep contradicts — iteration 1 was billed
"startable today" while its forks are open, and 6 still called itself the
ceiling-raiser after 2 took that role.
Docs only. linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- docs/stories/porch/ — a TRACK folder, not a status folder: status still
lives only in frontmatter. Adds `track: porch` so a query over
docs/stories/ can tell a porch 3 from a language 3
- 00-story.md carries the sequence, the dependency graph, and a table of
what the track explicitly does NOT own (binding -> 29, cache -> 18,
proxy -> 38, metrics -> 30, TLS/templates -> doctrine)
- eight iterations, each with phases, per-phase tasks, Given/When/Then
criteria, out-of-scope and the forks a spec must settle:
1 store-backed middleware (limiter + idempotency — needs nothing new,
first on purpose so the store pattern is proven cheaply)
2 randomness + cookies (phase A is language-track: a CSPRNG builtin;
`Resp.headers` being a map cannot emit two Set-Cookie lines)
3 sessions 4 CSRF 5 routing/response ergonomics (independent)
6 streaming core (the seam 7 and 8 wait on; chunked-request refusal
must survive) 7 SSE + compression 8 static + lifecycle hooks
- language iteration 39 -> status: hold, retitled superseded, with a row
mapping each of its goals to the porch iteration that took it. Kept, not
deleted: the Fiber study cites it and its randomness argument is what
this track is built on
- board gains a porch section; board-views gains porch and both-track
Dataview queries; porch README and the Fiber study §7 point at the track
- no code blocks in any story (plans carry concept and actions in words);
linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
