- loader.c: delete the INCOMPLETE-update BAIL; durable:false +
resident:keys stays refused (nowhere to read from)
- table.c: root-cause fix for the Text-index gap — a keys-resident
borrow now holds ENGINE values, matching wo_row_ptr's contract
(table.h's "no VM pointer" doctrine), not a VM-decoded row. Fixes
idx_hash/idx_cols_equal/wo_idx_probe AND db.c's GET_FIELD/PROBE
arms with one change; reproduced pre-fix as an ASan
heap-buffer-overflow
- docs/examples/residency: Product is genuinely resident:keys;
residency-accept.sh's refusal leg replaced by proving the program
runs and stock survives a restart (11/0)
- test_wal.c: oracle test drives resident:all and resident:keys
through the same update sequence and asserts identical rows;
Text-indexed-update test catches the representation bug; five
pre-existing tests corrected to the fixed contract (4746/0)
- story, README, status board, CODE-LOGIC.md updated; three known
limitations documented: mid-drain stale reads, O(N^2) replay in
chain length, compaction blind to per-row chain length
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit b87c68f950f01aa5e572fbb86a0f374adc83d813)
- the motivating workload was an audit log, which is append-only and so
argues for nothing. A catalogue is the real case: stable ids, and
stock moving on every order while name/price/sku sit still
- Product (durable, resident: all) and Cart (durable: false), with
place_order decrementing stock through a write-through field assign
- run `order` twice and stock goes 10 -> 7 -> 4: a level below the
seeded 10 can only mean an earlier order's UPDATE replayed. That is
the stronger claim — not just that inserts survive, but that a field
change does
- caught by running it three times: my first assertion required
before == 10, which only holds on a fresh seed and failed on the
third run even though the data was correct
- gate gains a leg for the update-replay claim; residency 12/0
- the commented resident: keys block now argues the DESIGN too: only
stock changes per sale, so appending the whole row would rewrite
every field to move one integer on a shop's hottest write path
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit d4104dcc5e3a460459dbf2d24043ce25b113bcdf)
- docs/examples/residency: one program, two tables filled by the same
loop, differing only in the annotation. Run twice against one WO_DATA
and orders replay while sessions do not
- the example checks its own claim (exits 1 if a durable:false table
survives, or a durable:true one fails to replay) rather than narrating
it in a print
- resident: keys is written out as a commented block with the loader's
exact refusal, so the frontier is visible in the example rather than
only in a story. It documents WHERE the refusal happens: woc compiles
it and emits a .wob; wovm exits 2, because the annotation is a
load-time property
- residency-accept gains two legs: the example runs and its restart
claim holds, and the refusal message the README quotes is checked so
doc and code cannot drift apart
- the gate writes the example's output to /tmp/residency.log,
banner-separated, for tail -F
- README commands verified verbatim; they needed mkdir -p because wovm
will not create WO_DATA
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit c9c7e03e62c3918cb65ef7994d1e33a0c5337b71)
