- loader's resident:keys refusal said "rows are still fully resident"
and "until tasks 5c/5d land". Both false since f606fc9. Corrected to
name the real blocker: UPDATE needs read-modify-append
- databasev2 00-story: the sequence graph drew 2->3->4, which reads as
3 needing 2 and 4 needing 3. Both backwards, and it still drew the
2->5->6 path the 2026-08-27 amendment retired. Redrawn stating only
real dependencies, with 4 and 3 shown as composing rather than
ordered, and the execution order that actually happened
- databasev2 03: the hazard and its Outstanding entry both claimed
nothing fails "because iteration 2's storage half is unimplemented".
Marked discharged, and recorded that the hazard named only half the
danger — the bitmap walk would have dropped keys rows outright
- databasev2 06: pending -> hold (largely superseded, revisit only on
a measurement); dated its 5c/5d references
- porch 01: rewritten to the settled shape. readiness ready, status
in-progress, phases B and C marked superseded with why
- porch 01 claimed time.after "is still a reserved builtin id". False —
builtin 90, implemented. That claim is what made the iteration look
cheaper than it is
- porch README gains honest ledger rows for both features (partial,
being rebuilt), not shipped
- skill-catalog README pointed at a story path that moved tracks;
linkcheck now 0 broken
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit b3d8c403e1d19ac27ec966de85cb293e0765795c)
Audit found 4 of 10 iterations citing it1 and 4 carrying stale claims the
measurement contradicts.
- 05: framing was contradicted, not merely incomplete. Its goal expected a
gradient to detect ("back-pressure before the cliff"); there is no cliff
— SIGKILL with swap off, exit 0 with swap on, and read latency STEPS
(1us -> 487us) rather than departing. Heading and goal rewritten; the
measurement makes the goal stronger, not weaker
- 05: budget must be bytes — 3.3x footprint spread — with headroom for
index doublings, else it fires during a rehash
- 05: new goal — eviction policy QUALITY is decisive, since getting the
resident set wrong costs 273x, not a few percent
- 06: its revival question now has a reference point. 273x is the KERNEL
SWAP path; `resident: keys` preads via page cache and must beat it. This
file revives only if 5c/5d lands near 273x rather than well below
- 04: write path is not where pressure bites (append ~1%, read 273x), so
the io_uring question that matters is iteration 2's deferred read-path
one, not group-commit
- 00-story: problem statement asserted the store "refuses the insert
rather than dying". Corrected in place — a banner above it was not
enough, a skimmer never reaches it
- residency spec: "swap thrash and the OOM killer" named exits that were
not measured; replaced with silence-or-a-corpse
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- `readiness: ready | refine` is a SECOND axis, orthogonal to status.
`ready` = the brainstorm is complete and the decisions are LOCKED (a spec
approved, or the forks explicitly confirmed). `refine` = open forks remain
and it cannot be planned yet
- `status: refine` RETIRED because it carried both meanings at once, so a held
iteration with an approved spec (language 18, 26) was indistinguishable from
one nobody had thought about. status is now purely where the WORK is:
done | in-progress | pending | hold — `pending` was already the board's own
rendering word, so nothing new was invented
- all 47 iterations classified from EVIDENCE in their own text, not by guess:
"the four forks are SETTLED" / "spec + plan approved" / "Approved spec:" for
ready; "Forks the spec must settle" / "no spec exists yet" for refine. Every
shipped iteration is ready by definition. 19 done, 5 in-progress, 15
pending, 8 hold; 27 ready, 20 refine
- two iterations moved refine -> in-progress rather than -> pending: language
31 and 34 are absorbed into 24 and work on them is literally happening, which
the board already showed as 🔄 while their frontmatter said otherwise. That
disagreement is now gone
- board legend, board-views' frontmatter contract, and two new Dataview
queries updated — the useful one being `readiness: ready AND status:
pending`, the startable set
WHAT THE NEW AXIS IMMEDIATELY SURFACED: of 15 pending iterations, exactly ONE
is startable — databasev2 4, io_uring group-commit, whose forks were confirmed
settled 2026-08-20. Everything else pending needs a brainstorm first. That was
invisible while one key carried both meanings, and it is now on the board.
Also caught by the sweep, unrelated to readiness but found by cross-checking
frontmatter against the board: SIX duplicate rows. Every iteration moved into
databasev2 was still listed in the LANGUAGE pending table under its retired id
(23, 32, 33, 20, 21, 27) as well as its new one. Stale copies removed. And two
databasev2 rows made claims the sweep contradicts — iteration 1 was billed
"startable today" while its forks are open, and 6 still called itself the
ceiling-raiser after 2 took that role.
Docs only. linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Flagged by the developer: the iteration still described the pre-brainstorm
three-mode design behind a "superseded in part" banner while four tasks had
landed against it.
- iteration 2 rewritten around the shape as built: two keys
(`durable: true|false`, `resident: all|keys`), not a `mode:` enum with
`cold`. status refine -> in-progress
- added a task-by-task progress table with commit hashes, and split the
acceptance criteria into MET (each with how it was verified, not just that
it passed — e.g. the goldens-unchanged claim is `git diff` over golden/
being empty after a WOC_BLESS run, since blessing rewrites all of them) and
OUTSTANDING with the task that owns each
- kept the history rather than deleting it: the three-mode replacement, the
"one real rewrite" that was fiction, and the opposite half that turned out
genuinely deep. An iteration file is where that record belongs
- board row rewritten to agree; the track index's "the lever" section, its
principle-7 paragraph and its sequence rationale all still taught the dead
three-mode design
ITERATION 6 IS NOW LARGELY SUPERSEDED, and bannered as such rather than
quietly gutted. `resident: keys` is the ceiling-raiser and it lives in
iteration 2 (tasks 5c/5d). More than relocated: 6's premise — a user-space
resident working set with faulting and 5's eviction policy — was specifically
REJECTED by the spec in favour of the kernel page cache, since a pread against
a cached page is a memcpy. What may still be left is recorded honestly: revisit
only with a measurement showing the page cache insufficient. Its fork list
survives, especially "does the language surface the fault cost at the use
site", which is still open and still the largest question about what writeonce
is. The sequence rationale is amended too — it had 6 as the ceiling-raiser and
5 as a prerequisite on the critical path; neither holds.
Docs only. linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- docs/stories/databasev2/, numbered from 1. Six PENDING database iterations
moved from the language track and renumbered, keeping the old id in
`was_language_iteration:` so a search for "iteration 32" still finds it:
32 -> 3 WAL checkpoint, 23 -> 4 io_uring commit, 33 -> 7 single-file store,
27 -> 8 query grammar, 20 -> 9 cross-program, 21 -> 10 keypair auth.
Done work (9, 9b, 22) stays as v1 history; language 18 left whole
- the problem, read off the engine not guessed: rows are malloc'd slabs with
addresses stable forever, NO eviction/spill/paging anywhere in database/src,
the WAL never checkpoints so boot replays all history, and durability is one
process-global WO_DATA so no table can say it matters more than another.
An allocation failure IS a clean catchable WO_T_OOM — but swap thrash
arrives first and carries no error signal at all, which is the real hazard
- four new iterations:
1 measure the ceiling FIRST (curve not cliff; the three exits; kill -9 at
exhaustion) — every later default should follow from a number
2 `@table(mode: ram | durable | cold)` — the grammar ask. Small surface
(Ast.table_cfg gains a key, the parser already rejects unknown args), big
semantics: `durable` defaults so nothing changes silently, and the
compiler refuses a durable row holding a `ref` into a ram table
5 bounded tables + refuse/evict/back-pressure, shedding BEFORE the OS acts
6 cold tiering — mostly forks, incl. whether the language surfaces the
fault cost and whether @unique on cold is refused outright. A paged
B-tree stays rejected: if tiering needs one, reject tiering
- 39 links repointed, link TEXT renumbered to track-local ids; arc gains one
pointer row replacing the six moved; board + board-views cover three tracks
- linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors; no code blocks in any story
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
