- docs/examples/employee-list: attaches to the running employee
program; modes list / report (byte-identical to A's own) /
staff <dept> / probe-write (registered read-only, insert must trap
access-denied, exit 4, A unchanged)
- the manifests ARE the design, written as a pair: A's [share] gains
listen = unix socket beside WO_DATA plus [[share.clients]] naming
B's public-key fingerprint with rights = "read"; B's
[connect.employee] carries A's ipc string, A's PINNED fingerprint,
and project = ../employee for compile-time shapes -- the connect
section's name is the code's namespace (employee.Employee)
- fingerprints are PASTE-HERE placeholders by design: keys generate
into WO_DATA at first boot (9d), tomls carry fingerprints only,
printed by --identity
- sample-first: compiles after 9/9b/9c/9d; README maps each mode to
the acceptance line it exists for; 9c/9d stories now name this
sample as their workload
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- docs/examples/employee: Department/Employee @table classes with
@unique, [dept] and [dept, salary] indexes, ref/backlink pair;
modes seed/report/staff/raise/drop per the 9b spec section 6 —
written AHEAD of the features (sample-first, like log-watcher);
README states it does not compile on today's toolchain and links
the plans that compile toward it
- report mode is the GroupBy showcase: group-and-reduce projection
{headcount, avg, min, max} ordered by avg desc, whole-query sum
for payroll; staff proves both navigation directions + index probe;
drop proves delete restrict (trap asserted)
- engine directory decision (user, 2026-08-15): database/ is its own
top-level dir, statically linked into wovm — file structures updated
in the iteration-9 plan and the 9b plan
- gap found by writing the sample: iteration 9's subset lacks a
`delete` statement and restrict needs one — added to 9b plan Task 3
- 9b plan Task 6 notes the sample is pre-authored and authoritative
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
