- done/ (11): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7b, 9, 9b, 15, 16 — landed iterations
(9/9b remainders live in the post-12 drain list, not in the files)
- refine/ (8): 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, 9g, 11, 13, 14 — everything marked
"no spec yet / brainstorm before planning"
- root keeps: 00-story (index), 05 (partial, plan 8 open), 8/10/12
(specs or plans exist), 17 (parked, spec+plan approved), 18 (next)
- every cross-reference re-pathed and VERIFIED resolving: board, specs,
plans, employee-list README, story table, intra-story links (moved
files' relative links deepened one level; done/7b's 9e pointer now
crosses to refine/)
- pre-existing dead link noted, not touched: refine/11-fibers.md points
at docs/plan/exploration/fibers/00-fibers.md which does not exist
(predates the move)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 9e durability/throughput/scale: the measurement backbone -- run the
employee program, restart to prove persistence, benchmark read/write
through compiled .wo, ~1M-row mixed load with throughput floor + p99
ceiling + flat RSS; the gate every optimization signs (before/after
delta required, no measured delta = not accepted)
- 9f io_uring group-commit: replace fsync-per-commit with batched
io_uring durability overlapped on shard threads; same ack-after-
durable contract, crash battery unchanged, automatic fsync fallback
on kernels without it; deliberately LAST (needs 8's threads to
overlap and 9e's baseline to beat)
- wired the existing levers into the arc: iteration 8 (thread-per-core)
= "optimize multithreading", 7b (mark-sweep) = "implement GC" --
each now gated by re-running 9e and recording the delta
- explicit sequence recorded in 9e: 9b lands -> 9e baseline -> 7b
re-bench -> 8 re-bench -> 9f re-bench
- roadmap + board rows for 9e/9f; four forks each for the specs
(load generator, absolute vs relative budgets, what "1M" means,
durable vs RAM headline; ring model, liburing vs raw, batch
boundary, fallback testing)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
