# Git commit history — features and their cherry-picks Reference for **which commits carried which feature onto `master`**, so a feature can be traced, re-reviewed, or reverted as a unit long after the history it was written in has moved on. ## The workflow this file records 1. **Development happens on `dev`.** Not on `master`, and not on a fresh branch per feature. 2. **Every commit on `dev` carries a feature-specific unique prefix**, written as the conventional-commit scope — `feat(db2-keys): …`, `fix(db2-keys): …`. The scope, not a bare leading word, so the repo keeps the `feat`/`fix`/`docs` type it has used throughout. One prefix per feature, reused by every commit belonging to it, which makes a feature's commits selectable with `git log --grep` without reading a single diff. 3. **When the feature is ready** — complete, not merely green — `git checkout master` and **cherry-pick** that feature's commits, in order. 4. **Record the result below**: the `dev` hashes, the `master` hashes the cherry-pick produced, and the date. The two differ — a cherry-pick makes new commits — and that mapping is the whole reason this file exists. Ready means the same gate as always: no half-implemented feature reaches master. An annotation the compiler accepts but does not honour counts as broken, however green the suite. ## Prefix registry One row per feature. The prefix is claimed here before its first commit, so two features cannot collide. | Prefix | Feature | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | `commit-history` | this file and the workflow it records | ✅ on `dev` | | `db2-keys` | databasev2 2 — `resident: keys` storage and readers | on `dev` (`125bd09`, `08abd09`, `0c97fa4`, `f606fc9`). **Not ready**: the loader still refuses the annotation, and updates on such a table are refused rather than implemented | | `porch-store` | porch store tables, Limiter and Idempotent middleware (Phases A, B, C) | on `dev` (`519d411`, `5b1e82a`, `aee7926`). **In progress**: Phase C was uncommitted work from a parallel session, committed as-is, and calls `json.decode`/`json.encode` with no `use json` import | | `query-corpus` | databasev2 query-grammar corpus #1 | on `dev` (`4c82461`). Conclusion was "no new grammar needed" | ## Cherry-picks onto master Newest first. `dev` hash is the original; `master` hash is what the cherry-pick produced. | Date | Prefix | Feature | `dev` → `master` | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | — | — | *nothing cherry-picked onto master under this convention yet* | — | ## Before this convention Work up to 2026-08-29 landed on `master` by **merging** feature branches, so those commits keep their original hashes and have no entry here. `git log --merges master` is the record for that period. The `db2-keys` and `porch-store` commits are the seam: they were written on `porch-store-middleware` before this convention (`18ce4d5`, `f9c36ef`, `11a92df`, `91411ae`, `6c8550a`, `01af1b9`) and were replayed onto `dev` with prefixed titles. The replay was verified identical, not merely applied — after it, `git diff porch-store-middleware dev` over the whole tree was empty. On 2026-08-29 every other branch was consolidated so only `dev` and `master` remain. Three could not be replayed and were preserved as **annotated tags** instead — nothing is lost, and each tag's message says why: | Tag | Why it is not on `dev` | | --- | --- | | `archive/cleanup-pre-existing-changes` | Aug 10, based on an Aug 8 commit. Carries `crates/` and `Cargo.toml` — the Rust runtime `master` has since deleted entirely. Replaying it would resurrect it. | | `archive/ipc-attach` | Iteration 9c attach channel. Refactors `wo_row_insert`/`wo_row_update_field` into engine-encoded cores; `dev` rewrote those same functions for `db2-keys`. Two overlapping refactors of one function, ~250 conflicted lines. | | `archive/keypair-auth` | Iteration 9d, builds on 9c — blocked by the same overlap. | The 9c/9d hazard is specific and worth stating: that branch's contract transfers ownership of `vals` **on failure as well as success**, while `dev`'s keys-resident arm returns early *without* freeing. A merge that compiles and passes could still leak or double-free. Reconciling them is an integration task, not a conflict resolution — recover the work with `git checkout -b archive/ipc-attach` when it is scheduled.