--- iteration: "33" status: refine --- # Iteration 33 — `WO_DATA=.db`: the persistent store as one file > Format: fiberloom `product/story-iteration-template`. Part of > [Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary](../00-story.md). > > **Inserted 2026-08-22** (developer ask: "can the persistent db be in > file.db form?"). The truth is already almost there: `WO_DATA=` > holds exactly ONE file (`shard-0.wal`) — the entire persistent state, > since RAM is authoritative and no data pages exist. This iteration > makes the surface say so: point `WO_DATA` at a file and THAT file is > the store. Small, driver-only, independent of the concurrency chain. ## Goals - **`WO_DATA=` accepts a file path.** A path that is not an existing directory is treated as THE wal file (`app.db`, `store.wo.db` — the name is the operator's). The directory form stays and keeps meaning `/shard-0.wal` — every existing deployment and gate is byte-identical. - **One file remains the whole truth at any core count** — stage 3 made the WAL owner-shard-only (shard 0 is the sole writer), so nothing multi-shard ever adds a second file. - **The contract says it out loud**: `04-db-binding.md` documents the file form, and documents honestly that the file is an append-only log that grows until iteration 32 lands. ## Acceptance Criteria - **Given** `WO_DATA=/tmp/app.db` (no such directory), **when** a program seeds, restarts, and verifies, **then** replay is byte-true and `/tmp/app.db` is the only artifact on disk. - **Given** `WO_DATA=` (existing directory), **when** the same program runs, **then** behavior is byte-identical to today — `/shard-0.wal`, every standing gate unchanged. - **Given** the db-bench durability legs pointed at the file form, **when** the restart proof and kill -9 battery run, **then** every guarantee holds identically (the file IS the same WAL, only named by the operator). ## Out Of Scope - A paged database file (SQLite's shape) — RAM is authoritative; the disk story is the WAL, full stop. - Checkpoint/compaction — [iteration 32](32-wal-checkpoint.md)'s; its rename-swap (write snapshot+tail to a NEW file, fsync, `rename()` over the old) is exactly what keeps the single-file promise crash-safe when it lands. 33 before or after 32 works; landing 33 first means 32's spec inherits the file form as a stated constraint. - Multiple stores per process, attach-by-file — held iteration 20's territory. ## Info - The whole change is `runtime/src/main.c`'s hardcoded `snprintf("%s/shard-0.wal", dir)` growing a stat-based fork (directory → today's path; otherwise → the path itself), plus a gate check and the binding-doc note. No engine, no WAL format, no compiler. - Fork for the (tiny) spec: what does a NONEXISTENT path mean? Leaning: a path whose parent exists and that does not end in `/` is a file to create; a trailing `/` or existing directory keeps the directory form. Refusing ambiguity loudly (WO exit 2) beats guessing. ## Proposed Solution Small enough for a bounded slice: brainstorm the one fork in chat, implement driver + db-bench file-form leg + docs in one pass, gates green. No plan document needed unless it grows.