- 9e durability/throughput/scale: the measurement backbone -- run the
employee program, restart to prove persistence, benchmark read/write
through compiled .wo, ~1M-row mixed load with throughput floor + p99
ceiling + flat RSS; the gate every optimization signs (before/after
delta required, no measured delta = not accepted)
- 9f io_uring group-commit: replace fsync-per-commit with batched
io_uring durability overlapped on shard threads; same ack-after-
durable contract, crash battery unchanged, automatic fsync fallback
on kernels without it; deliberately LAST (needs 8's threads to
overlap and 9e's baseline to beat)
- wired the existing levers into the arc: iteration 8 (thread-per-core)
= "optimize multithreading", 7b (mark-sweep) = "implement GC" --
each now gated by re-running 9e and recording the delta
- explicit sequence recorded in 9e: 9b lands -> 9e baseline -> 7b
re-bench -> 8 re-bench -> 9f re-bench
- roadmap + board rows for 9e/9f; four forks each for the specs
(load generator, absolute vs relative budgets, what "1M" means,
durable vs RAM headline; ring model, liburing vs raw, batch
boundary, fallback testing)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
shoney.arickathil
71d3985e81