- 8 tasks, 71 steps, from the 2026-08-26 table-residency spec
- deliberately contains NO code: discarded.md records "raw code in plan
documents" as rejected, and all six preceding plans have zero fences.
Stated in the header so it does not read as an omission. Every step
instead names the exact file and line region plus the required behaviour
- task order is by testable deliverable, not by layer:
1 grammar + defaults (no existing golden may move)
2 the cross-table check — a durable ref into a volatile table is refused
3 .wob v7: descriptor carries both properties, loader refuses the
meaningless combination so it never reaches the engine
4 durable:false skips the WAL at the three existing choke points in db.c;
replay refuses on mismatch rather than resurrecting rows
5 self-contained offset-based records — the one real rewrite, since
table.c returns a malloc'd address as the slot word today
6 resident:keys read path: id->offset map, pread, sequential scan;
@unique and FK-restrict across the boundary are the correctness core
7 the two runtime refusals — durable with no WO_DATA (silent data loss
today), and the resident-footprint budget
8 measure, baseline, crash battery, docs, closeout
- self-review table maps every spec section to a task. Two gaps found and
closed: the escape hatch for an intentionally ephemeral run (a refusal
with no way forward is worse than the loss it replaces), and persisting
the offset map in databasev2 3's snapshot
- linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
shoney.arickathil
3586650baa