shoney.arickathil
e120129f2c
Task 2 of docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-26-table-residency.md. - the check lives in `check_field_types`, which already runs over the raw AST (so the diagnostic lands at the field's own position, once per declaration) in Pass 2 with `syms` fully built - only the durable -> volatile direction is refused. volatile -> durable is legal: the referencing row is the one that disappears, so nothing is left holding a stale id - the message names both classes and both escapes, because "this is wrong" is less useful than "make Session durable, or declare Order volatile too" - sees through a `?` wrapper, so `?ref S` is caught too - code picked as 24 by sweeping `<stage>_prefix ^ "NN"` — 01-23, 25, 26 and 50 were taken, so 24 was a genuine hole. Grepping the literal WO-E224 would have found nothing, which is how ten codes once went missing - catalogued in the same commit, and the completeness sweep re-run: 53 emitted, 54 catalogued (the extra is retired WO-W201), none missing PLAN CORRECTION: the plan's second step said to apply the same check to `backlink` fields. Dropped — a backlink is "NOT a stored column" (ast.ml:72), so after a restart it resolves to an EMPTY COLLECTION, which is a legal state indistinguishable from "nothing references me". There is no id to dangle. Implementing it would have refused correct programs; a spurious diagnostic is worse than a missing one. A run fixture now pins that the backlink shape stays legal, so the check cannot silently grow over-broad later. Gates: woc-test 557/0, oop-e2e 118/0 (was 116 — one compile-fail and one run fixture added), employee 8/0, db-actor 8/0; employee, db-bench, db-actor, porch, log-watcher and gc-cycle all still typecheck. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 00-wob-format.md | ||
| 01-error-catalog.md | ||
| 02-corpus.md | ||
| 03-concurrency-coroutines.md | ||
| 04-db-binding.md | ||
| 08-builtin-surface.md | ||
| README.md | ||
docs/plan/oop-vm/ — OOP + systems track contracts
The normative contract documents both stacks cite. Landed by their named plan tasks:
| doc | contract | plan |
|---|---|---|
00-wob-format.md |
.wob bytecode format (compiler↔VM) |
1 |
01-error-catalog.md |
every WO-E### code |
2, grows 3/8 |
02-corpus.md |
how to add conformance fixtures | 3 |
03-concurrency-coroutines.md |
stackless fibers, park/resume protocols, reduction budget, the no-async rule |
arc (was plan 4's slot; that plan ✖ discarded 2026-08-21) |
04-db-binding.md |
row format, WAL records, query subset | 5 |
05-http-service.md |
route section, trap→HTTP table, JSON subset | 6 |
06-ui-live.md |
delta frames, subscribe protocol, wo:live | 7 |
07-systems-stdlib.md |
per-function nil-vs-trap contracts | 9 |
08-builtin-surface.md |
builtin source names, container/call/entry rules the emitter enforces | 3 |
Specs and plans: docs/superpowers/{specs,plans}/. Repo map: docs/08-project-structure.md.