Commit graph

253 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
b17b848403 docs(lang42): close out iteration 42
- story frontmatter status: done, Progress section records what landed
  vs the spec (everything, same day as the brainstorm)
- board: NEXT PLAN entry with the six standup answers (deadlock proven
  real: 5 s hang, 8192-byte truncation; 15 ms after; ping 2 ms during a
  parked child; 1000 spawns fd-flat; SIGTERM leaves no child); pending
  row flipped to DONE
- graph: node 42 class done, same change as the board row
- runtime/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: the bounded-subprocess section (bundle
  park, slot registry, ownership sweeps, raw pidfd syscalls)
- full belt at close: 19 runtime suites 0 fail (test_proc 128/0),
  woc-test 557/0, subprocess-accept 12/0, site-accept 23/0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 22:19:25 +02:00
c91027bcc6 feat(lang42): subprocess example + gate
- docs/examples/subprocess: line-oriented TCP service, one Handler actor
  per request — ping/run/slow/deadline/cap/long exercise the whole
  bounded surface from .wo, traps caught with try/catch in the language
- scripts/subprocess-accept.sh + `just subprocess`: 12 checks, 0 failures
  first run — deadline and cap messages verbatim, ping answered in 2 ms
  while a sleep-2 child was parked, SIGTERM exit 0 with the sleep-30
  child verifiably gone (pid checked from outside)
- service logs to /tmp/subprocess.log, banner-separated per run

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 22:19:25 +02:00
8bcd24969e docs(lang42): story, spec and plan for bounded subprocess
- claim the lang42 prefix; iteration 42 story (readiness: ready), approved
  spec, and the 11-task implementation plan
- board: pending row for 42; graph: node 42 with green edges (11, 24)
- graph: porch track section added (same sweep)
- parity studies that motivated 42: alacritty, tmux, zen-browser under
  docs/plan/exploration/ — staged path, gap lists, refused routes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 22:19:25 +02:00
bed1167ca9 docs(commit-history): record the iteration-12 cherry-pick
- seven commits dev to master, zero conflicts: the six db2-migrate
  commits plus site-deploy, which the close-out edits and which had
  been dev-only
- verified on master after the pick: 36 suites 0 fail (test_wal
  5966/0), woc-test clean, residency-accept 14/0, site-accept 23/0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 22:02:18 +02:00
4ad24d6381 docs(db2-migrate): close out iteration 12
- crash-before-rename test: a COMPLETE valid migrated temp beside the
  untouched original is discarded and the boot re-migrates — the
  sharpest point on the crash timeline, deterministic, no fault
  injection needed
- story: all six tasks done with commit hashes, all eight criteria met
  with the test that proves each, plus the three deviations from the
  plan and why (transcode over replay, lazy head, poison forces
  transcode)
- CODE-LOGIC: migration section; also corrected limitation 3, which
  still claimed unbounded hot-row chains — iteration 11 closed that
- status board row 12; deploy guide's rollback section gets its real
  answer (rolling back across a migration is a migration backwards:
  expect the refusal, restore the .bak)
- test_wal 5966 pass, 0 fail

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4bb6ece2531e2123eb958c91d9bef4a6528eab3b)
2026-08-31 21:54:27 +02:00
1b6d633ed1 docs(db2-migrate): spec + story for schema migrations v1
- brainstorm settled: declarative and automatic at boot; v1 verbs are
  add and delete only; data/seed migrations deferred to v2
- added fields zero-fill by kind: the grammar has no field-default
  syntax and v1 refuses to grow compiler surface for it
- same-kind delete+add refuses as a disguised rename; retype and
  vanished classes refuse by name
- schema lives in the log itself: WO_WAL_SCHEMA head record, written by
  fresh-log open and compaction; name-keyed diff also closes the
  silent cid-renumbering hole
- story is iteration 12, board row added, db2-migrate prefix claimed

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 072e007b144ff6689b6ff920ea10665900c1a2ef)
2026-08-31 21:54:27 +02:00
552c129ce3 docs(site-deploy): redeploy runbook for writeonce.de
- new docs/guides/deploying-site.md: build, content refresh, systemd
  unit, post-deploy verification, rollback, and the gaps behind each
  workaround
- leads with the trap that costs the most: shipping a binary does NOT
  update chapters. seed_if_empty only fills an EMPTY table and
  AdminEdit answers not_found for an unknown slug, so a host with an
  existing WO_DATA shows the old chapter list with no error anywhere
- that claim is measured, not argued: a 9-chapter build seeded a data
  dir, then the 10-chapter binary against it still 404'd /ch/storage
  and rendered 9 nav entries; wiping WO_DATA gave 200 and 10
- records two more blockers found while writing it: both site deps
  (porch, writeonce-view) 404 on GitHub and wo.lock is untracked, so
  the site submodule cannot build standalone; and the embedded wovm
  sets the glibc floor (this machine: 2.38, above Ubuntu 22.04's 2.35)
- build recipe run verbatim before publishing; releasing.md points here

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 930a715c4a3d847529e3e341edc71c65a7e11d1c)
2026-08-31 21:54:27 +02:00
e31a037533 docs(commit-history): record the site-submodule cherry-pick
- 4b56348 -> 7d9d526, 4eead89 -> 653a91c
- the registry rows for lang41, porch-store and query-corpus came with
  the pick and are kept: the registry is a global claim ledger, so a
  copy that silently omits three claimed prefixes is worse than one
  that names them and says they are dev-only
- site-submodule row corrected on the way in — it said "Not picked to
  master", which this pick is precisely what falsifies
- verified on master after the pick: site-accept 23 checks, 0 failures

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 22:03:43 +02:00
653a91c702 docs(commit-history): register the site-submodule prefix
- records that docs/examples/site is now a submodule on dev only
- states the consequence plainly: master still carries the site inline,
  so the branches differ structurally at that path until this is
  cherry-picked

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4eead8938c7292a130723aeabe7b74bdd1ba60f6)
2026-08-30 22:03:18 +02:00
7d9d526bb6 refactor(site-submodule): docs/examples/site becomes a submodule
- extracted to github.com/shoneyJ/writeonce-site with `git subtree
  split`, so the site keeps its own 9 commits of history rather than
  landing there as a flattened snapshot
- .gitmodules gains the third entry, alongside reference/writeonce-app
  and reference/writeonce-api; path is unchanged, so every doc and
  script that names docs/examples/site still resolves
- site-accept.sh fails early and says `git submodule update --init`
  when the directory is empty. Without it a clone lacking submodules
  copies an empty app and fails later as a build error naming nothing
- releasing.md: the steps that edit install/view.wo now say that edit
  is a commit in the site repo plus a pointer bump here — editing and
  committing only in this repo would record nothing
- gate re-run against the submodule: site-accept 23 checks, 0 failures

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4b5634801d5379890bad24c8129cfb23ab6b98df)
2026-08-30 22:02:55 +02:00
e93284befb docs(commit-history): record the databasev2 residency cherry-pick
- first cherry-pick under this convention: 37 commits, dev to master,
  mapped one-to-one with titles
- iteration 11 could not travel alone — its commits touch
  wo_wal_fold_row_at, keys_fold_into and row_apply_field_keys, none of
  which existed on master, so the whole db2-keys/db2-delta stack came
- porch-store (26 commits) deliberately left on dev: porch 1 was
  re-scoped mid-flight, which is what "ready, not merely green" is for
- records the three docs conflicts and how each was resolved, including
  keeping only the databasev2 half of a status entry that would
  otherwise have had master claiming porch 1 was done
- records what is still outstanding: task 6's byte-budget refusal, a
  missing guard rather than an unhonoured annotation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 20:45:39 +02:00
92d2600ae7 docs(commit-history): feature-to-cherry-pick reference
- records the workflow: develop on dev, feature prefix as the
  conventional-commit scope, cherry-pick onto master when ready
- prefix registry so two features cannot claim the same prefix; the
  prefix is claimed before the feature's first commit
- cherry-pick log maps dev hashes to the master hashes they produced —
  they differ, and that mapping is what makes a feature traceable or
  revertible as a unit after dev moves on
- notes the db2-keys seam: written pre-convention on
  porch-store-middleware, replayed onto dev, replay verified identical
- work before 2026-08-29 landed by merge; git log --merges covers it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 41923eb1f9510ab53804ca8dc6fe30a9a7eac849)
2026-08-30 20:44:14 +02:00
aee78c2296 feat(site): tutorial chapter for durable and resident storage modes
- new chapter 7, "Storage modes: durable and resident", covering what
  master gains with the databasev2 cherry-pick: durable: false for a
  RAM-only table, resident: keys for a table that outgrows RAM
- states the parts a reader would otherwise hit as surprises: a
  keys-resident table is REFUSED at startup without WO_DATA, an update
  appends a delta rather than rewriting the row, and the chain is
  bounded at 16 links so a hot row does not degrade reads or replay
- quotes the measured 2.55x smaller resident set, not an estimate
- actors/deps/serving shift to ord 8/9/10; seeding is ord-driven so an
  existing WO_DATA keeps its rows and only a fresh boot reseeds
- home card says a table can be RAM-only or outgrow RAM
- two gate legs pin the new chapter; site-accept 23 checks, 0 failures

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3b503c0db50aa737dd06ef6d17151c654a42c59b)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
710325b94a docs(db2-chain): close out iteration 11 on the board
- status: done in the story frontmatter (was the non-conventional
  "complete"; the board's axis uses done/in-progress/pending/hold)
- board row 11: what landed, the WO_WAL_UPDATE correction, the ceiling
  removed as unreachable, and the one criterion still weaker than
  written (expected value, not a resident: all oracle)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit de39a88e81e97bf6f8b75e9f15331aae20f7ab29)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
68dd3d88b8 test(db2-chain): cover flattening, and drop a ceiling no input could reach
- flattened row image is WO_WAL_UPDATE, not WO_WAL_INSERT: the row's
  original INSERT is already in a live log, so a second one for the same
  id is a duplicate replay refuses as corruption. INSERT is right only
  for compaction, which builds a fresh log
- remove WO_CKPT_MAX_GARBAGE: with the absolute term at 64 MiB, garbage
  large enough to reach a 256 MiB ceiling has already tripped it, so the
  branch was unreachable. Postgres needs both constants because it
  thresholds on tuples with its pair at opposite ends; this thresholds
  on bytes, where one constant does both jobs
- test_delta_chain_flattens_at_k: chain depth stays <= WO_DELTA_MAX_HOPS
  across 2K+2 updates, and a reset is observed
- test_delta_chain_flatten_replays: a flattened chain replays correctly
- test_keys_resident_indexed_across_flatten: a delta on an indexed
  column composes with flattening, checked at every step across the
  bound and after restart. Found no product defect
- test_should_compact_absolute_and_ceiling: pins the absolute term, the
  boundary just under it, and the small-log case the ratio still governs
- test_wal 5700 pass / 0 fail; wovm-test and woc-test green

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit f93b5d9db753305c297e868d977670e6d703684c)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
2cad84b7c6 feat(db2-chains): bound a keys-resident row's delta chain
TESTS DELIBERATELY HELD at the developer's instruction — logic only.
The existing suite passes (36 suites, 0 fail) but exercises NEITHER new
behaviour: nothing builds a 16-deep chain, and no checkpoint test uses a
log near 64 MiB. Green here means "did not break what existed".

- tier 1: wo_wal_fold_row_at gains hops_out. The walk already visits
  every hop, so the depth is free — this is the design's pd_prune_xid,
  a cheap "is work worth doing" hint taken from work already happening
- the update path branches on it: past WO_DELTA_MAX_HOPS (16) it writes
  a full-row image instead of a delta, terminating the chain. `r`
  already holds the complete post-update row because index maintenance
  required folding it, so flattening costs bytes, not an extra read
- wo_wal_append_row_image encodes from a caller-held row, as
  WO_WAL_INSERT: a chain's base must replay into a database where
  nothing precedes it, so replay/compaction/fold need no change
- tier 2: should_compact gains a TRIGGERING absolute term and a ceiling.
  Our `floor` SUPPRESSES on a small log — the opposite of postgres's
  vac_base_thresh, which triggers on a small absolute problem the
  proportion hides. We had the proportion and the suppressor and
  neither real guard
- verified by construction, not test: both update entry points converge
  on row_apply_field_keys; db.c captures next_offset BEFORE calling in,
  so the re-point is transparent to which record type was written

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1b808abd5942de81c3a6416714d1302384103040)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
841f6c8f3f feat(db2-keys): gate the residency measurement, close out task 7
- new `residency` leg in db-bench.py driving docs/examples/residency-bench:
  two tables identical except the annotation, control cap + binding cap
- ITS OWN PROGRAM, not a db-bench mode: declaring a resident: keys table
  is a WHOLE-PROGRAM constraint, so the no-WO_DATA refusal fires for
  every mode in the module. Putting those classes in db-bench's shared
  types made growth/ceiling/randread — which run without WO_DATA —
  refuse to start. Caught by running the leg, not by reading it
- gates the RATIOS, waives the absolutes: ops/sec under a cap is swap
  and disk I/O and belongs to the box. Same split randread makes
- rss_ratio 2.55 floor 2.0 tol 10% (structural, like bytes_per_row);
  overcap_vs_swap_x 1.53 floor 1.0; in_ram_cost_x 4.23 ceiling 8.0;
  all_collapse_x 105.4 floor 2.0
- all_collapse_x exists because the leg's FIRST run silently measured
  nothing: at QUICK's 40k rows a 48 MiB cap binds neither mode, so the
  "over-cap" half was not over cap. The cap now scales with N and the
  leg asserts it binds
- verified the gate bites: rss_ratio 1.4, overcap_vs_swap_x 0.6 and
  in_ram_cost_x 12.0 are all rejected
- task 7 closed: both criteria moved to Met with how each was verified

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit a310496664982c372f51b43113465eb8ad9e9fb5)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
6fc5b4b7d4 feat(db2-keys): GB-scale bench modes, unmeasured
- hreadall/hreadkeys: the same resident A/B as wread_*, but ~2 KB per
  row so a GB of data is reachable in a few hundred thousand inserts
- the insert path is fsync-bound at roughly 2 000 rows/s, so row COUNT
  is the expensive axis and row SIZE is nearly free — 20k rows already
  produce 38 MB
- NOT RUN: the GB-scale measurement was called off. These modes are
  committed working and typechecking so the leg can be run later
  without rebuilding it, not because a result exists

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit abc276ac39dd45a1052b6ae24d25aedb9eea3e1e)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
882c1f7d24 feat(db2-keys): task 7 — measure resident: keys against swapping
- two tables identical except the annotation, 200k rows, 40k reads in
  one key order, WAL on ext4 (not /tmp, which is tmpfs here and would
  have put the log in RAM), rootless cgroup v2 cap
- WIDE shape, 2.55x smaller resident set: 34.4 MB vs 87.5 MB. That is
  the real win and the thing the mode was built for
- under a 48 MB cap (between the two resident sets): keys 19635 ops/s
  vs all 12854 — only 1.53x faster than letting the kernel swap
- degradation is far gentler though: all collapses 105x from its own
  uncapped throughput, keys 16x
- costs 4.2x read throughput when memory is not tight, and writes are
  markedly slower — the keys fill did not finish in 2 min where the
  resident fill plus 40k reads did. No design doc had costed writes
- THE UNANTICIPATED FINDING: cgroup limits charge the PAGE CACHE, so
  moving rows to a file does not escape a container memory limit. WAL
  37 MB + RSS 34 MB cannot both live under a 48 MB cap, so every pread
  reaches disk. The premise "the page cache will hold the hot rows"
  fails in exactly the deployment this targets
- first attempt used Int-only rows and showed parity; recorded, because
  drop_payload frees a field's VALUE and an Int's value is its inline
  slot word, so that shape cannot benefit and would have condemned the
  feature for the wrong reason
- verdict: keep it, to fit ~2.5x more data in given RAM — not to make
  an over-capacity table fast

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7cba9b1174b0bf581314b3147e25cc49e6f49464)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
cfd660a5e6 docs(db2-chains): spec + story for bounding a row's delta chain
- fixes a limitation iteration 2 shipped: compaction was supposed to
  bound chain length, but wo_wal_should_compact triggers on a whole-log
  byte ratio and cannot see one hot row's chain
- tier 1, flatten on update: the update path ALREADY folds the row for
  index maintenance and the fold already walks hop by hop, so it reports
  depth for free. Past a fixed K it writes a full row instead of a
  delta. Read <= K+1 reads, replay O(K^2) per row. No format change, no
  per-row RAM, no new trigger
- tier 2: our compaction policy has a proportional term and a
  SUPPRESSOR misleadingly called a floor; postgres's floor TRIGGERS on
  small absolute garbage. Add that term and a ceiling
- design read from .dev/reference/postgresql, not recalled:
  heap_page_prune_opt gates on an O(1) on-page hint then page fullness
  against Max(fillfactor, BLCKSZ/10); autovacuum uses base + scale *
  reltuples clamped by a max (50, 0.2, 1e8). Neither thresholds on
  new-bytes-versus-old-bytes
- K deliberately does NOT scale with table size: postgres scales a
  table-level aggregate with proportional harm, ours is per-row with
  additive cost, so scaling up would make big databases boot worst
- the story says plainly it should NOT be next: task 7 has still never
  measured whether resident: keys beats the kernel's own paging

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit f667cad2cfbe187b5973440ab1af015b2df288f8)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
b058feb517 docs(db2-delta): guide to log-structured rows for a new reader
- explains replay, the row chain, how a checkpoint flattens it, and why
  replay of a long chain is quadratic
- worked SKU example with the actual record layout and back-pointers,
  and a trace of the fold showing first-seen-wins
- states plainly why the checkpoint does not bound the hot-row case:
  both triggers are ratios over the whole log and nothing counts
  per-row chain length
- records the bounded-memory vs linear-time conflict behind the O(N^2)
  replay rather than presenting it as an oversight
- closes with the reviewing lesson, since this shape survived several
  rounds: complexity bugs hide in the caller's loop, not in the linear
  helper being read

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit e6434403d566b5d72a24e9c0dcad1f25a2c16320)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
64035bf177 docs(db2-delta): resident:keys has storage; move done criteria to Met
- "no storage behind it" / "nothing yet stores a table that way" was
  false — CRUD, checkpoint survival and updates all landed; replaced
  with an accurate summary naming task 6/7 as what remains
- the three checked delete/delete-replay/update criteria sat in
  Outstanding despite being done; moved to Met, leaving Outstanding
  holding only genuine task 6/7 work

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit b575678ee95fa3125fa4e8145320a9cdca10ba38)
2026-08-30 20:38:03 +02:00
e08c26309a feat(db2-delta): lift the resident:keys refusal, prove it end to end
- loader.c: delete the INCOMPLETE-update BAIL; durable:false +
  resident:keys stays refused (nowhere to read from)
- table.c: root-cause fix for the Text-index gap — a keys-resident
  borrow now holds ENGINE values, matching wo_row_ptr's contract
  (table.h's "no VM pointer" doctrine), not a VM-decoded row. Fixes
  idx_hash/idx_cols_equal/wo_idx_probe AND db.c's GET_FIELD/PROBE
  arms with one change; reproduced pre-fix as an ASan
  heap-buffer-overflow
- docs/examples/residency: Product is genuinely resident:keys;
  residency-accept.sh's refusal leg replaced by proving the program
  runs and stock survives a restart (11/0)
- test_wal.c: oracle test drives resident:all and resident:keys
  through the same update sequence and asserts identical rows;
  Text-indexed-update test catches the representation bug; five
  pre-existing tests corrected to the fixed contract (4746/0)
- story, README, status board, CODE-LOGIC.md updated; three known
  limitations documented: mid-drain stale reads, O(N^2) replay in
  chain length, compaction blind to per-row chain length

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit b87c68f950f01aa5e572fbb86a0f374adc83d813)
2026-08-30 20:37:49 +02:00
048633bf27 docs(db2-delta): correct a line citation before execution
- the plan placed the fold near wo_wal_read_row_at at "line ~600";
  it is at line 794
- every other citation verified: wal.h:46, table.c:452/487,
  db.c:88/289, wal.c:738, wal.c:861

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit c6cd48679e21e510696391b340c735aa0ad098f9)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
3f88b07abb docs(db2-delta): implementation plan for keys-resident delta updates
- 6 tasks: the record kind, the fold, updates + indexes, the request
  path and group commit, replay + compaction, then lifting the loader
  refusal and proving it end to end
- the fold is written ONCE and called from three places; the tests are
  arranged to prove each caller separately, and the plan says that
  wanting a second fold "just for this caller" means the design failed
- Task 2 includes a same-field ordering test specifically, because a
  fold walking the chain backwards the wrong way returns plausible data
  and is otherwise invisible
- Task 6 step 1 audits the db.c request arms BEFORE lifting anything —
  they were never audited for keys-residency the way the inline path
  was, and the last audit of that kind found delete corrupting memory
- self-review found the spec's crash criterion had no task: added a step
  that commits a delta, skips the re-point, and replays, which is the
  state a crash between barrier and flush leaves behind
- every symbol the plan names verified to exist in database/src
- code-free per house convention; the writing-plans skill wants code
  blocks and the project rule overrides it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit abb8fc9454bdca9d8d703c8cfeb224f89a93d14d)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
04017aea26 docs(db2-keys): spec — delta records for keys-resident updates
- updates append a DELTA (class, id, field, value, back-pointer), not a
  full row. The workload decides it: a product catalogue changes one
  narrow field of a wide row on every order, so a full-row append would
  rewrite every field to move one integer on a shop's hottest path
- the back-pointer keeps the id map at one slot per row, which is the
  mode's whole premise; a map growing per update would defeat it
- ONE fold function, three callers (read, replay, compaction). Three
  implementations of one rule is how they drift, and a fold that differs
  between reading and replaying is a database that changes its mind at
  boot. Named as the design's principal risk
- indexed columns MAY change: price is exactly what a catalogue indexes,
  so forbidding it would be a restriction users meet immediately
- no chain cap, deliberately. Compaction already rewrites live rows, so
  every checkpoint resets every chain, and deltas grow the log which
  pulls the next checkpoint forward — the workload that lengthens chains
  triggers the fold that shortens them
- the risk that accepts: one hot SKU under an otherwise quiet write
  rate. Task 7's benchmark must include it
- supersedes the 2026-08-26 spec's one-line full-row Update sketch,
  marked in place rather than left as a second design in the tree

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit c9a88b05c4c62a5df13253686c990aaccc3f9cbb)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
0b0d54121f docs(db2-keys): the residency example becomes a product catalogue
- the motivating workload was an audit log, which is append-only and so
  argues for nothing. A catalogue is the real case: stable ids, and
  stock moving on every order while name/price/sku sit still
- Product (durable, resident: all) and Cart (durable: false), with
  place_order decrementing stock through a write-through field assign
- run `order` twice and stock goes 10 -> 7 -> 4: a level below the
  seeded 10 can only mean an earlier order's UPDATE replayed. That is
  the stronger claim — not just that inserts survive, but that a field
  change does
- caught by running it three times: my first assertion required
  before == 10, which only holds on a fresh seed and failed on the
  third run even though the data was correct
- gate gains a leg for the update-replay claim; residency 12/0
- the commented resident: keys block now argues the DESIGN too: only
  stock changes per sale, so appending the whole row would rewrite
  every field to move one integer on a shop's hottest write path

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit d4104dcc5e3a460459dbf2d24043ce25b113bcdf)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
7b39da7eb6 fix(db2-keys): a logged delete must replay on a keys-resident table
- wo_row_remove's keys arm borrows the row from the log to find its
  index entries, and a borrow reads through db->rt->wal. At boot that
  pointer is not wired yet: main.c replays first (main.c:226) and
  assigns rt.wal afterwards (main.c:268)
- so the borrow found no log, the remove failed, and replay reported a
  valid tombstone as CORRUPTION. An UPDATE record would have failed the
  same way, since replay applies it as remove-then-recreate
- replay now lends the runtime a read-only view over the fd it already
  has open, for the replay's duration only, and restores what was there
- broken by the delete fix in 76b8fd9 — deletes worked in-process but
  their tombstones broke the next boot. Unreachable in production only
  because the loader still refuses the annotation
- pinned by test_keys_resident_delete_then_replay, verified failing
  against the unfixed code (2 failures) and clean with it
- found by asking whether the read-modify-append plan was ready, not by
  a gate

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit dc25462461b9f79d70c803f7174adc90fa16c90e)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
516bd8362d docs(db2-keys): a runnable example for per-table storage
- docs/examples/residency: one program, two tables filled by the same
  loop, differing only in the annotation. Run twice against one WO_DATA
  and orders replay while sessions do not
- the example checks its own claim (exits 1 if a durable:false table
  survives, or a durable:true one fails to replay) rather than narrating
  it in a print
- resident: keys is written out as a commented block with the loader's
  exact refusal, so the frontier is visible in the example rather than
  only in a story. It documents WHERE the refusal happens: woc compiles
  it and emits a .wob; wovm exits 2, because the annotation is a
  load-time property
- residency-accept gains two legs: the example runs and its restart
  claim holds, and the refusal message the README quotes is checked so
  doc and code cannot drift apart
- the gate writes the example's output to /tmp/residency.log,
  banner-separated, for tail -F
- README commands verified verbatim; they needed mkdir -p because wovm
  will not create WO_DATA

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit c9c7e03e62c3918cb65ef7994d1e33a0c5337b71)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
7ad52937b2 fix(db2-keys): delete on a keys-resident table was memory corruption
- wo_row_remove read the id map's value as a slot, but on a keys table
  that value is a LOG OFFSET (hput(t, id, wal_off + 1)). slot_row does
  no bounds check, so a delete indexed t->slabs[] with a byte offset and
  then called db_val_free on whatever it landed on — arbitrary frees,
  not a wrong answer
- keys tables now take their own arm: no slab slot, no bitmap bit, no
  free-list entry to return. The index hook needs the row's values, so
  the row is borrowed from the log for exactly that long
- wo_row_ptr carried the same trap and is public. It cannot refuse keys
  tables outright (insert legitimately calls it while the map still
  holds a slot), so it now detects the offset case — index past the
  slabs, or bitmap bit clear — and returns NULL. Callers all handle NULL
- test_keys_resident_delete pins it; it SEGVs against the old code,
  verified by reverting the fix rather than assumed
- found while auditing every hget() reader before narrowing the loader
  refusal to allow benchmarking. The refusal was justified in the docs
  by "updates are unimplemented" while actually standing in front of
  this too: a guard whose stated reason is narrower than its real one
  gets removed by someone who believes the stated reason

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 76b8fd944af9ed062467bdf9ab93c2e96dd198cf)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00
97c7c40fd8 docs(db2-chain-review): review the databasev2 chain and dependency graph
- chain is a cross-track field (1-6); only databasev2 3 and 4 carry it,
  and iteration 2 — critical path, in-progress — carries none, so the
  board's chain query cannot see it
- 00-story.md's ASCII graph draws 3 before 4; the chain field and the
  history both say 4 first (4 part A 08-28, 3 08-29). Graph is wrong
- graph also contradicts its own prose on edge direction, and still
  draws the 2-5-6 path the 2026-08-27 amendment retired
- iteration 3's hazard section is stale: it says nothing fails "because
  iteration 2's storage half is unimplemented", which 5c/5d ended
- and it was incomplete: it named offsets going stale, but compaction
  walked the bitmap, which a keys row has no bit in, so those rows
  would have been dropped from the new log outright — data loss, not a
  bad pointer, and offset-rebuilding would not have caught it
- coupling is now bidirectional: wal.c compaction calls iteration 2's
  wo_row_next_id / wo_row_offset1 / wo_row_set_offset
- nothing in the track is blocked on anything else in the track

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2ecaf0c95f40c6d6c8cc2fde687c82d63cda1f7e)
2026-08-30 20:37:21 +02:00
8311330531 docs(db2-keys): reconcile databasev2 and porch markdown with the code
- loader's resident:keys refusal said "rows are still fully resident"
  and "until tasks 5c/5d land". Both false since f606fc9. Corrected to
  name the real blocker: UPDATE needs read-modify-append
- databasev2 00-story: the sequence graph drew 2->3->4, which reads as
  3 needing 2 and 4 needing 3. Both backwards, and it still drew the
  2->5->6 path the 2026-08-27 amendment retired. Redrawn stating only
  real dependencies, with 4 and 3 shown as composing rather than
  ordered, and the execution order that actually happened
- databasev2 03: the hazard and its Outstanding entry both claimed
  nothing fails "because iteration 2's storage half is unimplemented".
  Marked discharged, and recorded that the hazard named only half the
  danger — the bitmap walk would have dropped keys rows outright
- databasev2 06: pending -> hold (largely superseded, revisit only on
  a measurement); dated its 5c/5d references
- porch 01: rewritten to the settled shape. readiness ready, status
  in-progress, phases B and C marked superseded with why
- porch 01 claimed time.after "is still a reserved builtin id". False —
  builtin 90, implemented. That claim is what made the iteration look
  cheaper than it is
- porch README gains honest ledger rows for both features (partial,
  being rebuilt), not shipped
- skill-catalog README pointed at a story path that moved tracks;
  linkcheck now 0 broken

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit b3d8c403e1d19ac27ec966de85cb293e0765795c)
2026-08-30 20:36:55 +02:00
533fc5294f feat(db2-keys): rewire remaining readers, survive compaction
- wo_row_read and the @unique shadow probe go through borrow/release;
  release runs before every exit, including wo_row_read's early return
- updates on a keys table refused explicitly in wo_row_update_field and
  the slot variant: no slab slot to mutate, and writing the borrow's
  scratch would discard the write silently. Needs read-modify-append
- compaction walked the bitmap, which a keys row has no bit in — every
  such row would have been dropped from the new log. Now walks
  wo_row_next_id and re-points each row to where it lands
- moves records byte-for-byte (copy_record) rather than decoding: a
  borrowed row holds VM values, enc_val expects engine values, and ASan
  caught that mismatch as a 4294967292-byte memcpy
- wo_row_set_offset updates a value in place and never rehashes, so a
  wo_row_next_id cursor stays valid while compaction re-points
- a compaction that fails after moving rows is fatal: the map would name
  an unlinked temp file, and the intact log replays correctly
- test_keys_resident_survives_compaction pins both failure modes; rows
  rewrite in hash order so offsets really move
- loader still refuses resident: keys — updates are not implemented

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit f606fc9b76d983cac2b348f03f7d4f01433cd905)
2026-08-30 20:36:31 +02:00
02b4b13a52 Merge master into db-residency-doctrine — and close the two half-exposed features
The branch was 17 ahead / 25 behind with 11 conflicting files, and drifting
further: db.c had been rewritten twice on master since (group commit, then
compaction). Resolved rather than rebased so both histories stay legible.

Conflicts, and how each was settled:

- db.c: BOTH semantics kept. Master's fatal path and compaction check now sit
  behind the branch's `table_is_durable` predicate, in all three inline arms —
  a volatile table reaches neither the barrier nor the compaction check
- db-bench sample: every mode from both sides (growth, growth-verify, randread,
  replayseed, wmix) and ONE `boot` mode, which both sides had added
  independently
- db-bench.py: all six legs kept. Both sides had also grown the same
  WAL-size helper under different names; collapsed into one
- perf-targets: the branch's §5 (RAM ceiling) then master's §6/§7 — master's
  numbering had already assumed a §5 it did not have
- story frontmatter: master's `status` (the landing truth) plus the branch's
  `readiness` axis. 03 would have read `done` + `refine`, which is a
  contradiction — it was brainstormed and landed on master, so `ready`
- board: both standup blocks newest-first; master's chain rows (a superset);
  the branch's databasev2 1-2 rows with master's 3-4. Fixed a stray `|` in
  master's row 3
- baseline: master's, then REGENERATED from a full campaign — 143 metrics,
  132 checks, 0 failures with both sides' legs present

TWO HALF-EXPOSED FEATURES FIXED, because the merge rule is that master gets
no feature that is honoured in name only:

- `resident: keys` PARSED, set a .wob flag, and did nothing: rows stayed fully
  resident. A developer could declare a 120 GB table keys-resident, watch it
  compile, and be OOM-killed. The loader now REFUSES it with a message naming
  what to write instead, until tasks 5c/5d land. The compiler still parses it
  and its AST golden still passes, so the grammar work stays tested
- `durable: false` was honoured ONLY on the inline path. wo_db_exec_req had no
  guard at all, so a volatile table written from an actor on a worker shard
  would still be logged — precisely porch's session-table case, and precisely
  what iteration 2 exists to provide. All three request-path arms now carry the
  same predicate. Found by reading the merged code, not by a test: the obvious
  probe runs main() on the primary and therefore only exercises the inline path

Verified on the merged tree: wovm-test 0, woc-test 0, oop-e2e 122/0,
residency-accept 8/0, db-bench 132/0, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 10:14:25 +02:00
8b29eb492c docs(db): T6 closeout — checkpoint documented, chain's last link lands
databasev2 3, task 6. Documentation, plus three gate-tolerance
corrections that are justified rather than silent.

- 04-db-binding.md: the NORMATIVE rule — compaction may run only where
  nothing is staged (a correctness requirement, not scheduling), recovery
  is unchanged, and a failed compaction is a missed optimisation rather
  than a durability event
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: why one file and not snapshot-plus-tail
  (Postgres CANNOT compact — page deltas; ours are full row images, so a
  compacted log IS a store), why rename is the whole crash-safety story,
  why the dump flushes but does NOT fsync when it does, why the
  replacement is preallocated, and where the trigger is checked
- README: the checkpoint knobs, the extended walstats line, the boot mode
- story -> status: done, with criteria split met/outstanding
- board: standup entry in the six-question shape, both rows rewritten

THE OBLIGATION IS AT THE COMPACTOR, not only in a spec: compaction moves
every record, so it invalidates every WAL offset iteration 2's
`resident: keys` stores, and the loop that knows each record's new
position must rebuild that map. Nothing fails today because that storage
half is unimplemented — it would fail later, looking like corruption.

Board claim corrected before it shipped: I wrote that the concurrency
chain is "complete". It is not — chain 5 stays in-progress because
databasev2 4's part B was never done and its premise was invalidated by
part A. Every link has landed its PLANNED work; that is a different
statement.

Gate tolerances, each with the measurement that justifies it:

- ckpt.pause_us_max is no longer gated relatively. The raw pause scales
  with the live set and this workload's live set is not fixed (wmix's
  hist_dump inserts a row per latency bucket), so gating it gates the
  box. Added ckpt.pause_us_per_mb — the engine's own rate, gated for
  real, and the metric that would have caught the 8x dump regression —
  with the absolute 50ms budget still guarding the raw pause
- ram.*.msgrate 15% -> 70%. PRE-EXISTING, and measured: 10.7M-17.9M
  msgs/sec across ten full runs, several predating this work — a 1.67x
  spread against a 15% gate
- durable.sN.*.p99us 100% -> 300%, with more evidence than the first
  widening: mixread 1043/2318/4147us, mixwrite 1623/4446us on the same
  build. Floors stay the real guard and are not slack

Battery: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail, woc-test, oop-e2e 119/0,
db-bench 117 checks 0 failures, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 06:48:34 +02:00
40d56c4664 perf(wal): checkpoint measured — 2.16x space, 1.78x boot, 2.7ms pause — T5
databasev2 3, task 5.

Full campaign, same workload twice, differing only in whether
checkpointing may fire:

- WAL used 1962358 -> 907094 bytes (2.16x reclaimed)
- boot 114 -> 64 ms (1.78x), median of 3
- stop-the-world pause max 2651us against a STATED 50ms budget

The budget is asserted, not assumed: 50ms is a stall a serving process
can absorb without a client seeing a timeout, and the leg fails if it is
exceeded. The pause is O(live rows) — at ~181 MB/s a 1GB live set implies
~5.5s, which is the number an incremental design must be bought against.
The spec deliberately did not buy it in advance.

FOUND BY MEASURING: the dump was 8x slower than it needed to be. It
flushed through wo_wal_commit, which fdatasyncs, so it paid one barrier
per 256 records. Intermediate durability there is worthless — the temp is
not authoritative until the rename and is fsynced once immediately before
it. With a single final barrier:

- ~107KB live: 23948us -> 2903us
- ~500KB live: 36361us -> 7526us
- ~1.98MB live: 107649us -> 13212us
- marginal ~22 MB/s -> ~181 MB/s, sync-bound to bandwidth-bound

Correctness re-proven after that change: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail,
test_wal 760 pass including the 40-round kill-during-compaction battery.

Two measurement defects of my own, fixed rather than reported:

- boot measured through the driver's run() helper reported 251ms both
  with and without checkpointing — run() samples RSS on a 250ms poll, so
  every timing floors at the quantum. Measured directly instead, median
  of 3
- ckpt.reclaim_x was recorded as lower-is-better by the default detector,
  which would have PASSED "reclaimed nothing" and FAILED an improvement:
  the feature's central claim, gated backwards. Now higher-is-better,
  gated at 15% while the wall-clock metrics stay wide — waiving them all
  would have left the leg ungated, part A's task 4 mistake

- sample gains a `boot` mode that does nothing, so boot time is boot time
- walstats now reports compactions, pause max/total and compacted bytes
- baseline refreshed from the FULL campaign (N=20000, crash_reps=3), and
  a fresh full run passes 116 checks 0 failures
- gate bites: reclaim_x doctored to 1.0 -> FAIL on exactly that metric

One flake seen and checked, not papered over: durable.sN.query.ops_sec
failed once at 53% below baseline. It is a read-only metric that touches
no WAL code, and a re-run passed 116/0 with the box at load 1.85.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 06:20:13 +02:00
74399ffc68 docs(plan): WAL checkpoint — 6 tasks, databasev2 3
Plan for the approved spec. Code-free per the repo convention
(docs/plan/discarded.md:54); the executor writes the code.

- T1 wo_wal_compact: walk live rows via the bitmap, append one INSERT
  each through the EXISTING append path, fsync, rename over the live log,
  fsync the parent dir, reopen the descriptor. Test asserts BOTH that the
  log shrank AND that a replay reproduces the same rows/ids/values —
  shorter alone is worthless, a truncating bug also passes that
- T2 a stale temp file is removed at open and never read. The test uses
  PLAUSIBLE records, not garbage: garbage would be rejected anyway and
  would prove nothing
- T3 the trigger as a PURE decision (used bytes, last compaction's
  measured output, floor) so it is unit-testable without a store; env
  knobs for floor and ratio, which is what makes the policy testable at
  all. No timer, with the reason. The check is called only where nothing
  is staged, asserted by a test that stages and expects deferral
- T4 kill -9 DURING compaction, extending the existing fork-based crash
  battery. Asserts the PROPERTY — the store equals the pre- or the
  post-compaction content, never a mixture, and every acked id survives.
  Run repeatedly and state the count: it is a race, one green run proves
  little
- T5 measure space reclaimed, boot before/after, and the stop-the-world
  PAUSE against a stated budget. If the pause exceeds it, stop and report
  — the alternatives are bought against that number, not before it
- T6 closeout, including the normative ordering rule in 04-db-binding.md

Constraints carried from the spec into every task:

- recovery must NOT change; a task editing the replay path should stop
- the dump must FLUSH PERIODICALLY. stage() grows the staging buffer by
  doubling, so dumping a whole store through one buffer would hold the
  entire store in RAM — the unbounded growth databasev2 1 identified as
  how this engine dies
- a FAILED compaction is a missed optimisation, not a durability event,
  so it must not take databasev2 4's fatal path
- gate tolerances must not be waived wholesale (part A's T4 made that
  mistake), and the baseline is full-mode — writing a quick-mode baseline
  over it is a regression part A also made

Deliberately NOT a task: rebuilding the `resident: keys` offset map. It
cannot be implemented against a feature that does not exist yet, so T6
records it as an obligation at the compactor and in the story instead of
a stub nobody can test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 17:44:18 +02:00
69c34c9a89 docs(spec): WAL checkpoint — compact by rewrite + atomic rename
databasev2 3, chain 6. Brainstormed 2026-08-28 after databasev2 4 part A
landed.

Design: compact the log by rewriting it as one record per live row into a
temp file, fsync, rename over the live WAL, fsync the parent dir, reopen.
Recovery is COMPLETELY UNCHANGED — boot still opens one file and replays
it — and the crash criterion ("the same store as if the checkpoint had
never started") is satisfied by rename, not by code we must get right.

Read .dev/reference/postgresql for this. The finding is that PG's design
is UNAVAILABLE to us, which is what makes the simpler option legitimate:

- PG never compacts its WAL; segments before the redo point are recycled
  by rename or unlinked. Its records are page deltas, so a compacted redo
  log is not a store — hence heap files, a control file, a redo pointer,
  a second recovery source and a separate process
- ours are FULL ROW IMAGES (apply_record implements UPDATE as
  remove-then-recreate), so a compacted log IS a complete store. That one
  difference deletes all of the above from the design
- what IS worth porting is the ordering discipline: publish the new
  "recovery starts here" atomically and LAST, so a crash falls back. PG
  needs a start-of-checkpoint redo pointer plus an end-of-checkpoint
  control file update; we get the same property from one rename, because
  we can swap the whole data set atomically and PG cannot

Forks settled:

- no snapshot format — the compacted log is the snapshot, existing grammar,
  so no new encoder or decoder and the dump reuses wo_wal_append_insert
- one source, not two
- volume-only trigger, as a ratio against the LAST compaction's measured
  output (the denominator is known exactly; estimating the live set would
  mean estimating Text) with an absolute floor. NO TIMER — PG's exists to
  bound loss from unflushed buffers and we have none; an idle log does not
  grow. Copying the mechanism without the reason was the trap
- stop-the-world, with the pause measured against a stated budget rather
  than assumed acceptable; alternatives are bought against a number
- compaction may run ONLY where nothing is staged (right after a barrier),
  or a staged record lands in a file about to be replaced. Normative

Recorded before it can be found late: compaction invalidates every WAL
offset iteration 2's `resident: keys` stores, so the compactor rebuilds the
offset map as it writes. Nothing breaks today because that storage half is
unimplemented — it would break later, looking like corruption.

Also corrected exploration/postgresql/buffer-and-checkpoint.md, which was
wrong on two counts: PG does NOT update its control file by rename (in-place
full-block write + CRC32C), and its checkpoint sketch assumes writeonce has
segment files, which it does not and deliberately will not.

Grounding measured on master: seed 20000 leaves a 986614-byte log; 20000
updates take it to 2590262 bytes with the SAME live rows, and boot+verify on
that store is 155ms.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 17:39:38 +02:00
0b618ace19 docs+fix(db): T6 closeout — and reads no longer wait for the barrier
databasev2 4 part A, task 6. Mostly documentation, plus one real fix the
full battery caught.

THE FIX. The drain held EVERY DB reply until the barrier — including
reads, which stage nothing and have no stake in durability. That parked
readers behind an fsync for no reason: durable.sN.mixread.p99 rose from
~1043us to 4057us. Only a statement that actually staged a record now has
its reply held. Caught by the gate, not by review.

THE TRADE, recorded rather than smoothed over. What remains is inherent: a
barrier blocks the owner shard LONGER (more records per fsync) though LESS
OFTEN, so anything queued behind one waits. Three full runs of the same
build gave durable.sN.mixread.p99 of 1043 / 2318 / 4147us and wmix.p99 of
8758 / 20000us — a 2-4x spread with the box near idle. So part A buys ~3x
write throughput at the cost of a longer, noisier tail on the owner shard,
and that is the strongest argument for part B (submit and keep serving).

- durable.sN.*.p99us tolerance widened to 100% WITH the reason in the
  code: a 2-4x-variable tail gated at 50% gates the disk, not the engine.
  The floor is the real guard and is not slack — mixread's (4172us) came
  within 25us of tripping on the worst run. Baseline refreshed; a fresh
  full run then passed 106 checks 0 failures

EXIT STATUS MOVED 3 -> 74 (sysexits EX_IOERR). 3 and 4 are already used by
SAMPLES for their own meanings — db-bench's own `verify` exits 3 on a
checksum mismatch, and it is the gate that exercises durability, so a
durability abort exiting 3 would have been indistinguishable from the
mismatch it should help diagnose. The low range belongs to programs.

Docs:

- story: progress, the payoff measured two ways, the cost side, criteria
  split met/outstanding, and a "part B — its premise changed" section:
  it was justified by "close the 66x gap", but that gap is two problems
  and only the concurrent one was a batching problem
- board: standup entry in the six-question shape; both databasev2 4 rows
  rewritten. They had said "close the 66x gap" — recorded as MIS-STATED
  rather than quietly renumbered
- 00-wob-format.md and 04-db-binding.md: the normative failure contract
  ("a failed WAL commit traps WO_T_IO after un-applying the row") was
  false; corrected, along with the tick-scoped group commit that never
  happened
- database/src/CODE-LOGIC.md: where the barrier runs and why there, why
  replies are held, why the inline path is asymmetric, the one failure
  rule, and how to measure it
- db-bench README: the wmix mode, the env knobs, and the tmpfs warning

Battery: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail, woc-test, oop-e2e 119/0,
db-bench 106/0, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 16:48:23 +02:00
6183a67dfc perf(db): group commit measured — ~2.9x durable write throughput, T5
databasev2 4 part A, task 5.

Controlled before/after — same machine, same workload (wmix 4000 32),
same build except db.c and vm.c, two runs each interleaved:

- per-statement barrier: 2213 / 2177 ops/sec, p50 7183 / 7251us
- group commit:          6216 / 6525 ops/sec, p50 3458 / 3444us
- ~2.9x throughput, ~2.1x lower p50

The full campaign confirms it a second way: s1 takes the inline path and
commits per statement BY DESIGN, so within one build the shard configs are
batching-off vs batching-on — 1467 -> 5117 ops/sec, mean batch 1.0 -> 5.43,
peak 1 -> 57. 3.5x, agreeing with the 2.9x above.

Recorded honestly:

- the BEFORE p99 is at the histogram ceiling (hist_add clamps at 20000us
  and both runs pinned there), so the true figure is >=20ms and unknown.
  The improvement is AT LEAST 2.3x; the old p99 was off the instrument
- durable.sN.mixwrite went 480 -> 492 ops/sec, i.e. UNCHANGED. That was
  the spec's original payoff metric and correcting it was part of the
  brainstorm: mix performs 20 writes at C=4, mean batch 1.01. A workload
  that never has two writes in flight cannot be helped by batching them
- seed is likewise unchanged: a serial writer has nothing to batch with
- so the payoff is real but CONDITIONAL — it appears where concurrent
  durable writes fan into the owner shard, and nowhere else

Two traps recorded in perf-targets §6:

- do not benchmark durability on /tmp: it is tmpfs here, where fdatasync
  is free. The same run reported 195000 ops/sec at p50 1us there against
  2200 at p50 7200us on ext4 — no barrier to amortise, so the measurement
  measures nothing. db-bench keeps its stores under bench/ for this reason
- the record count is not the update count: 7755 records for 4000 updates,
  because hist_dump and the done-marker are themselves durable inserts

- FIXED a regression I introduced in T4: master's committed baseline is
  FULL mode (N=20000, crash_reps=3, msg_n=200000) and I had overwritten it
  with quick-mode values. Regenerated from a full campaign; the full run
  now passes 106 checks 0 failures against it
- gate still bites: sN wmix ops_sec -70% -> FAIL on exactly that metric

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 09:54:52 +02:00
5f9598af6a feat(db-bench): prove batches form — the write-concurrent leg, T4
databasev2 4 part A, task 4. Scope extended with developer approval: the
plan authorised touching the sample only for observability, but no
existing leg has enough concurrent durable writes to exercise group
commit at all, so the payoff was unevaluable either way.

The finding that forced it:

- `mix` writes on one op in ten with C=4 (all_mode calls mix_mode(n/10,
  4); Mixer writes on i % 10 == 9), so the quick run performs 20 writes
  total. Measured mean batch 1.01 over 3112 barriers, peak 3
- that is a property of the WORKLOAD, not the mechanism: peak 3 of a
  possible 4 shows batches form whenever writes actually coincide

- `wmix N C` added: every op a durable write, C at once. Updates rather
  than inserts, so it is comparable to mixwrite and the row count stays
  flat. Histogram kind 2 — a replayed store still holds the seeding run's
  kind-0/1 Hist rows and merging those would report someone else's
  latencies
- WO_WAL_STATS=1 prints one line at exit: batches, records, peak_batch,
  peak_staged. Opt-in, because it would otherwise pollute every durable
  program's output. Counters live in wo_wal; no builtin, the numbers are
  diagnostic and not part of the language

Measured, and it scales with concurrency exactly as designed:

- C = 4 / 16 / 64 -> mean batch 1.13 / 1.76 / 5.35, peak 3 / 10 / 39
- the gate's own legs: durable.s1 5412 records over 5412 barriers (mean
  1.0, peak 1 — the inline path, one barrier per statement BY DESIGN),
  durable.sN 7757 over 2296 (mean 3.38, peak 28) at 2x the throughput
- peak staged 1372 B settles the no-cap decision with a number: the batch
  is tiny, so the upstream mailbox bound is sufficient

- mean_batch/peak_batch are higher-is-better (the default detector would
  have called bigger batches worse)
- only the batch SHAPE metrics are waived to 100%; wmix throughput and
  latency keep real tolerances (15% s1, 50% sN) — a blanket waiver would
  have left the entire new leg ungated
- the live assertion `mean > 1.0` on the sN leg is what catches inertness
- gate bites: sN wmix ops_sec -60% -> FAIL on exactly that metric, 1 of 86

Verified: db-bench-quick 89 checks 0 failures; baseline refreshed (86
metrics).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 09:47:51 +02:00
026919762b docs(plan): WAL group commit — 6 tasks, databasev2 4 part A
Plan for the approved spec. Code-free per the repo convention
(docs/plan/discarded.md:54); the executor writes the code.

- T1 a failed barrier is detected and fatal — one entry point that names
  the operation, errno, WAL path and batch size, then exits. The abort
  path itself stays unexercised and the task says so rather than buying
  coverage with a fault-injection switch
- T2 the barrier moves to the drain point and replies are held; the
  request path stops committing per append. Riskiest task, and its risk
  is one place: the crash legs. Plan says STOP if they fail, do not
  adjust the test
- T3 the inline path takes the same fatal rule but keeps its own barrier,
  with a comment explaining the asymmetry so the next reader does not
  "fix" it. Looks like a no-op; without it the two paths disagree, which
  is the unevenness the spec exists to remove
- T4 prove batches actually form BEFORE measuring the payoff — otherwise
  a win gets attributed to the wrong cause. Also records peak staged
  bytes, settling the no-cap decision with a number
- T5 measure, gate, write it down. If the payoff is absent, say so and
  stop: part B must not start on an unproven premise
- T6 closeout, including the error catalogue — WO_T_IO leaving the write
  path is language-visible and must be written down

Spec corrected while planning: it pointed at durable.s1.seed as the
payoff. Wrong, structurally — worker shards hold no WAL, so a queue only
exists when other shards write, and a serial writer has nothing to batch
with. The real target is durable.sN.mixwrite: 480 ops/s at p99 5888us
against s1's 1023 at p99 664, so adding shards currently makes durable
writing WORSE. That inversion is a better argument for the iteration than
the one the story recorded.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 09:06:09 +02:00
75aedf1216 docs(spec): WAL group commit — databasev2 4 part A
Brainstormed 2026-08-28. The iteration is split: part A batches, part B
(io_uring submission) is deferred until A's measurement says whether the
blocking boundary still dominates.

The story's premise needed correcting first:

- it says "replace fsync-per-commit with io_uring group-commit", but the
  engine commits per STATEMENT — db.c calls wo_wal_commit right after
  every append, all six sites, so each row change is one pwrite + one
  fdatasync
- so two independent wins were being carried as one, and only the second
  needs io_uring. The staging buffer already holds any number of records;
  today it never holds more than one. Part A is mostly deleting calls
- iteration 22's numbers say A is where the payoff is: durable writes
  4460 ops/s, mixwrite 1023 ops/s p99 664us, against 1.28M ops/s reads

Forks settled:

- batch boundary is QUEUE-DRAIN, not the tick this story had recorded: a
  tick adds latency to a lone writer, taxing an idle system to serve a
  busy one. Queue-drain self-tunes and needs no knob
- shard 0 holds each reply envelope instead of sending it, commits once
  when the queue empties, then releases all — so a writer is acked after
  the barrier carrying ITS record, which today is true only because
  every batch has one member
- a failure between "RAM mutated" and "record durable" is a FATAL,
  diagnosed abort. This replaces uneven behaviour that already exists:
  insert rolls back, update and delete do not and say so in a comment
  ("RAM ahead of disk"). Batching would have multiplied that
- consequence stated, not slipped in: WO_T_IO leaves the write path
- no batch cap initially; peak staged bytes is measured so the question
  is settled by a number

One gap disclosed rather than hidden: forcing a real fdatasync failure
needs mount privileges, so the unit test proves the error is DETECTED and
the abort itself stays covered by inspection.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 07:48:11 +02:00
62d29d6a77 docs(24): T10 closeout — stories done, board, graph, ledger, CODE-LOGIC
Iteration 24 closes, absorbing 31 and 34. No code in this commit.

- stories 24, 31, 34 -> `status: done`, each with a landing banner. 24's
  records the gate numbers and BOTH disclosed deviations: monitor takes
  three arguments (the caller may be `main`, which has no mailbox) and a
  v1 `call` reply is a typed scalar (which is what let the agreement be
  checked at compile time, WO-E226). 31's notes it landed INSIDE 24 and
  that a fifth mechanism it never anticipated came out of proving the
  gate — the drain guarantee (40). 34's names the gap it did NOT close:
  still no RNG, so CSRF/sessions stay blocked
- board: in-progress row cleared, marker doc deleted (convention), the
  standup entry in the six-question shape, chain note — next link is
  databasev2 4 (io_uring group-commit, chain 5)
- graph: PUBSUB2 (pub/sub + WebSockets, "rejected until here") -> done
- porch ledger: a WebSocket/pub-sub row added; the cancellation row now
  says what it actually waits on rather than repeating "the arc"; the
  README's "no WebSockets/SSE" limitation was stale — WebSockets are
  supported, SSE and chunked encoding are not
- CODE-LOGIC: runtime/src gains the actor-lifecycle section (call, death,
  the cap counter's sender/home-thread split, the monitor walk, the timer
  list), the drain guarantee, and the digest section; docs/examples/chat
  gains its own — actor topology, WHY two actors per connection, fd
  ownership, and the shutdown choreography

Battery after the doc edits: wovm-test 36 suites 0 fail, woc-test exit 0,
oop-e2e 119/0, chat 11/0, web-app 46/0, linkcheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 00:06:31 +02:00
d87846354e docs(board): iteration 24 is 9 of 10 and on master; only T10 closeout remains
- narrative said "five of ten tasks landed" and named the branch as the
  live location; T4/T5 (ids 89/90) had landed and the slice merged to
  master 2026-08-27 (60414a1, fast-forward)
- records what was verified ON master: chat 11/0 at the full 1000-client
  soak, runtime 36 suites 0 fail, compiler 556 checks, corpus 119 checks
- T10 closeout is what still holds stories 24/31/34 open

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 23:44:56 +02:00
60414a1754 feat(runtime): the shutdown drain guarantee — iteration 40
A message sent before the stop flag is observed must be delivered and run
before the engine stops. One rule; a spin count could never express it.

- root cause in `shard_main` (runtime/src/vm.c): NEXT_RUNNABLE() already
  stated the contract — "a WORKER on stop keeps DRAINING ... so queued
  shutdown messages (close frames!) still run" — but the IDLE branch
  contradicted it, calling fib_reap_all and breaking on WO_IO_STOP,
  abandoning its inbox for wo_engine_stop() to free wholesale
- an actor between messages is exactly that idle case, which is why a WARM
  soak server hid it: warm shards held live fibers and took the right path
- fix: while the primary's drain window is open, an idle worker adopts its
  inbox and runs what arrives; sched_yield on an empty poll so a drain
  cannot burn a core per shard and starve the actors it exists to let run
- unreachable at WO_SHARDS=1: wo_engine_stop returns early at nshards <= 1

Measured:

- fresh-server SIGTERM drain: 5 of 16 failing before, 20 of 20 clean after
- `just chat` at the FULL 1000-client soak: 11 checks, 0 failures, both
  WO_IO backends, ASan clean with zero leaks
- the fd leg settled at scale too: 1000 connections left the count at 44,
  unchanged after 20 more — lazy per-shard init, not a leak
- runtime battery 36 suites (18 x both dispatch flavors) 0 fail;
  compiler 556 checks 0 fail

- story: docs/stories/language-runtime-database/40-shutdown-drain-guarantee.md
  (chain 3 with 31, status done), board row, slice marker updated
- outstanding and named: a pin below the gate needs new multithreaded test
  infrastructure — nothing in runtime/test/ drives wo_engine_start/stop and
  no corpus fixture can trigger a stop

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 23:43:45 +02:00
3bc85d85f3 docs(slice): marker reflects T4/T5 landed, the drain blocker, and the stale-artifact trap
- T4 monitor + T5 time.after landed in 4092074 (ids 89/90); marker still
  listed them pending because it came from master, which lacks that commit
- records the branch baseline (18 suites x 2 flavors, 0 fail) and the gate
  at 11 of 12 legs green
- names the stale-artifact trap: after a branch switch, compiler/_build and
  runtime/build hold the OTHER branch's binaries, and a v7-vs-v6 mismatch
  surfaces only as "no listener"
- the drain guarantee is now the single named blocker; nothing else in the
  slice should land before it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 23:28:25 +02:00
4af1e8bcdd fix(chat gate): every leg starts its own server — and it found a real bug
Gate defects, all measured:

- fd check was core-count dependent: `fds_before + 8` read LAZY per-shard
  init as a leak. Shards init on first fiber, each taking one io_uring +
  one eventfd, capped at nproc; on 20 cores the first wave legitimately
  adds 18. Measured 26 -> 44 after 20 clients, still 44 after 40 more.
  Replaced with the invariant the check is for: a second wave must not
  raise the count. Core-count independent, and catches a slow leak that
  any fixed slack would hide
- a failed leg ORPHANED its server: drain inherited $SRV from the soak
  leg, so its python died on int("") and the soak server was never
  killed — its listener then broke the next run's soak on the same port.
  drain now starts its own server; cleanup kills every server a run
  started, matched on the run's unique temp dir
- two legs the plan requires were missing: WO_SHARDS=1 (the single-shard
  control) and WO_MAILBOX=8 (drop-slow-member backpressure). Both added,
  both green. The mailbox leg shrinks the slow client's SO_RCVBUF so it
  needs no sleeps
- chat adopted the porch naming (use porch/..., [deps] key) after the
  rename landed on master

Decoupling the legs exposed a REAL drain bug, traced and documented in
docs/2026-08-27-chat-drain-finding.md, NOT fixed here:

- on a FRESH server the SIGTERM drain is flaky: 5 of 16 runs left a
  client at EOF with no close frame and no diagnostic
- traced: main -> Registry -> Room -> Writer. Registry runs (diag
  confirms), the Room NEVER processes its shutdown message, so the
  Writer's close branch never runs. Clients that do get a frame are
  saved by their own Reader seeing env.stopping()
- ruled out: the spin budget (a 1s wall-clock deadline still failed 2 of
  12 — reverted, it fixed nothing and cost 1s per shutdown),
  dummy_writer() spawning during shutdown, and write failure
- the fix is an engine guarantee — a send issued before the stop flag is
  delivered — which belongs to the actor lifecycle, not a spin count

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 23:27:46 +02:00
ebc3522c40 Merge branch 'master' into chat-ws-lifecycle 2026-08-27 23:11:49 +02:00
3507aafea3 docs(databasev2): propagate iteration 1's findings to every consumer
Audit found 4 of 10 iterations citing it1 and 4 carrying stale claims the
measurement contradicts.

- 05: framing was contradicted, not merely incomplete. Its goal expected a
  gradient to detect ("back-pressure before the cliff"); there is no cliff
  — SIGKILL with swap off, exit 0 with swap on, and read latency STEPS
  (1us -> 487us) rather than departing. Heading and goal rewritten; the
  measurement makes the goal stronger, not weaker
- 05: budget must be bytes — 3.3x footprint spread — with headroom for
  index doublings, else it fires during a rehash
- 05: new goal — eviction policy QUALITY is decisive, since getting the
  resident set wrong costs 273x, not a few percent
- 06: its revival question now has a reference point. 273x is the KERNEL
  SWAP path; `resident: keys` preads via page cache and must beat it. This
  file revives only if 5c/5d lands near 273x rather than well below
- 04: write path is not where pressure bites (append ~1%, read 273x), so
  the io_uring question that matters is iteration 2's deferred read-path
  one, not group-commit
- 00-story: problem statement asserted the store "refuses the insert
  rather than dying". Corrected in place — a banner above it was not
  enough, a skimmer never reaches it
- residency spec: "swap thrash and the OOM killer" named exits that were
  not measured; replaced with silence-or-a-corpse

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 22:47:37 +02:00