2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
Iteration 11 — blue-green in-runtime deployment
Format:
product/story-iteration-template. Part of Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary.
Goals
- The story's closing promise: the running binary updates its own code. Two fixed VM slots (activity alternating); a proposal pipeline — propose → approve → in-runtime compile → additive schema migration → load → health → atomic switch — with the previous version staying resident as the instant rollback target.
- The developer drives it remotely:
wo remote pull / propose / diff / approve / rollback / statusover a loopback management transport, every stage streaming live and WAL-audited.
Acceptance Criteria
- What to achieve?
- Given a running fixture app and an additive code+schema change,
- when the developer proposes and approves it,
- then the deploy completes with zero dropped requests (in-flight work drains on the old slot), and the binary's embedded source trailer matches the new active version afterward.
- What to achieve?
- Given a failure at any pipeline stage (compile diagnostic, destructive-change rejection, load failure, health failure, drain timeout),
- when it occurs,
- then the active slot keeps serving untouched, the failure is visible in the SSE stream and the WAL trail, and a destructive change was rejected at propose time naming the offending declaration.
- What to achieve?
- Given a completed deploy,
- when
wo remote rollbackruns, - then the previous version serves again in under one second with no compile and no data change — additive-only migration guarantees old code runs correctly against the migrated schema.
- What to achieve?
- Given kill -9 during COMPILING / MIGRATING / SWITCHING / trailer-rewrite,
- when the unit restarts,
- then it serves one consistent version and the WAL shows whole migrations only.
Out Of Scope
- Script-based/destructive migrations, in-runtime editing workspace, MCP/agent wrapper over the management plane — all recorded follow-ups.
- Fibers (the vision's §3; a scheduler concern, not a deploy concern).
Info
- Approved spec:
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-03-blue-green-vm-design.md; its implementation plan is deliberately authored only after iterations 9–10 ship (prerequisites: a catalog to diff, HTTP machinery to build on). - VMs own code; the engine owns data — the separation that makes the switch cheap and rollback unconditional.
Proposed Solution
- Author the implementation plan from the approved spec once iterations
9–10 land, then execute it (slots, deploy state machine, additive
differ, management surface + SSE,
wo remoteverbs, crash battery).