- new `residency` leg in db-bench.py driving docs/examples/residency-bench:
two tables identical except the annotation, control cap + binding cap
- ITS OWN PROGRAM, not a db-bench mode: declaring a resident: keys table
is a WHOLE-PROGRAM constraint, so the no-WO_DATA refusal fires for
every mode in the module. Putting those classes in db-bench's shared
types made growth/ceiling/randread — which run without WO_DATA —
refuse to start. Caught by running the leg, not by reading it
- gates the RATIOS, waives the absolutes: ops/sec under a cap is swap
and disk I/O and belongs to the box. Same split randread makes
- rss_ratio 2.55 floor 2.0 tol 10% (structural, like bytes_per_row);
overcap_vs_swap_x 1.53 floor 1.0; in_ram_cost_x 4.23 ceiling 8.0;
all_collapse_x 105.4 floor 2.0
- all_collapse_x exists because the leg's FIRST run silently measured
nothing: at QUICK's 40k rows a 48 MiB cap binds neither mode, so the
"over-cap" half was not over cap. The cap now scales with N and the
leg asserts it binds
- verified the gate bites: rss_ratio 1.4, overcap_vs_swap_x 0.6 and
in_ram_cost_x 12.0 are all rejected
- task 7 closed: both criteria moved to Met with how each was verified
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit a310496664982c372f51b43113465eb8ad9e9fb5)
shoney.arickathil
841f6c8f3f