writeonce/docs/stories/language-runtime-database/refine/24-chat-websocket-workload.md
shoney.arickathil a798cf6698 docs: pending iterations renumbered by dependency + priority
- developer directive: pending iteration IDs now ARE the priority order;
  LANDED iterations keep historical numbers (code comments and commit
  history cite them — records, not a queue); 8/11 (the half-landed
  arc), 17 (parked, artifacts on a branch), 18 (next, artifacts named)
  also frozen
- mapping (recorded in 00-story): 19<-20 Float+Bytes, 20<-9c attach,
  21<-9d keypair, 22<-9e benchmarks, 23<-9f io_uring WAL, 24<-19 chat,
  25<-10 services, 26<-12 blue-green, 27<-9g query corpus,
  28<-14 skillhost, 29<-13 metaprogramming
- 11 story files renamed; every doc reference re-numbered (word-boundary
  sweep for the lettered 9x ids, phrase-level for numeric ones); the
  iterations table rewritten with Seq == priority and "(was N)" notes;
  story-scoped link check: zero broken
- merge-recovery folded in: the partial master merge had dropped the
  chat story, the fibers exploration note, the arc spec+plan, the
  framework-v2 plan, and the iteration-17 spec+plan — all restored from
  their branches and renumbered consistently

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 14:31:09 +02:00

69 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Iteration 24 — chat: the WebSocket pub/sub driving workload
> Format: fiberloom `product/story-iteration-template`. Part of
> [Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary](../00-story.md).
>
> **Inserted 2026-08-20** (concurrency-chain refinement): the 8+11 arc's
> driving workload, the role log-watcher played for iterations 3–7. Needs
> its spec AFTER the arc's — it lands at the arc's end and proves it.
## Why this iteration exists
Everything the framework ledger parks behind concurrency — WebSockets,
pub/sub, streaming, per-request cancellation, the keep-alive parking
retirement — needs a workload that actually exercises long-lived
connections and cross-shard broadcast, or the arc ships mechanism without
proof. Chat is the smallest honest such workload: rooms, N concurrent
clients, fan-out on every message, presence on connect/disconnect — one
binary, no broker.
## Goals
- `docs/examples/chat`: rooms + broadcast + presence over WebSocket,
served by the framework through `[deps]` exactly as the web-app is.
- Framework grows the WS mechanism in pure `.wo`: the HTTP/1.1 upgrade
handshake (Sec-WebSocket-Accept needs SHA-1/base64 — the crypto-builtin
fork's first real consumer), frame parse/serialize (text, close, ping),
fiber-per-connection serving (iteration 11), and in-memory channels
whose delivery is cross-shard message send (iteration 8).
- The arc's acceptance teeth: 1k concurrent clients across shards,
broadcast latency measured, starvation-free under one hot room,
SIGTERM drains every connection cleanly.
## Acceptance Criteria (draft — the spec after the arc refines)
- **Given** two clients in one room on DIFFERENT shards, **when** one
sends, **then** the other receives the frame (cross-shard ownership-move
delivery), and a third client in another room receives nothing.
- **Given** 1k connected clients with one hot sender, **when** the
reduction budget preempts, **then** every room keeps making progress
(no starvation) on one OS thread per core, verified by TID.
- **Given** SIGTERM with clients connected, **when** the server drains,
**then** every connection gets a close frame, every fiber unwinds its
drop maps (ASan zero leaks), and the process exits 0.
- **Given** the web-app running beside chat features, **when** the
standing gates run, **then** nothing regresses — HTTP and WS share the
serve loop honestly.
## Out Of Scope
Message persistence/history (a `@table` an app adds if it wants — not the
workload's point); auth beyond the existing bearer mechanism; permessage
compression; binary frames beyond echo coverage; wss (TLS stays at the
proxy — the proxy story extends to WS pass-through, documented).
## Info
- Dependencies: the 8+11 arc (fibers + cross-shard send), the crypto
builtins fork (SHA-1 for the upgrade handshake — note: the ledger's
crypto slice lists SHA-256/512; the WS handshake specifically needs
SHA-1, so the builtin set must include it), and the framework's parse
seam (upgrade is an HTTP request until it isn't).
- Unparks on landing: the framework ledger's WebSocket/pub-sub rows and
the iteration-18 rejection note ("pub/sub REJECTED until 8/11").
## Proposed Solution
Brainstorm → spec → plan after the arc's spec exists; the arc's plan and
this iteration's are written against each other (the arc names chat as
its acceptance, chat names the arc as its substrate).