writeonce/docs/stories/databasev2/02-table-storage-modes.md
shoney.arickathil 516bd8362d docs(db2-keys): a runnable example for per-table storage
- docs/examples/residency: one program, two tables filled by the same
  loop, differing only in the annotation. Run twice against one WO_DATA
  and orders replay while sessions do not
- the example checks its own claim (exits 1 if a durable:false table
  survives, or a durable:true one fails to replay) rather than narrating
  it in a print
- resident: keys is written out as a commented block with the loader's
  exact refusal, so the frontier is visible in the example rather than
  only in a story. It documents WHERE the refusal happens: woc compiles
  it and emits a .wob; wovm exits 2, because the annotation is a
  load-time property
- residency-accept gains two legs: the example runs and its restart
  claim holds, and the refusal message the README quotes is checked so
  doc and code cannot drift apart
- the gate writes the example's output to /tmp/residency.log,
  banner-separated, for tail -F
- README commands verified verbatim; they needed mkdir -p because wovm
  will not create WO_DATA

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit c9c7e03e62c3918cb65ef7994d1e33a0c5337b71)
2026-08-30 20:37:27 +02:00

225 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
track: databasev2
iteration: "2"
status: in-progress
readiness: ready
---
# databasev2 2 — per-table storage: `durable` and `resident`
> Part of [Story — databasev2: the database beyond RAM](00-story.md).
> Spec: [`2026-08-26-table-residency-design.md`](../../superpowers/specs/2026-08-26-table-residency-design.md)
> · plan: [`2026-08-26-table-residency.md`](../../superpowers/plans/2026-08-26-table-residency.md)
> · runnable example: [`docs/examples/residency`](../../examples/residency/README.md),
> gated by `just residency`.
>
> **The language enrichment this track exists for.** Before this, durability was
> one environment variable for a whole process: `WO_DATA` set and every `@table`
> is WAL-logged, or unset and none are (`runtime/src/main.c`, and `db.c` guards
> each append on the WAL pointer). Real applications are not uniform — a session
> table and a rate-limit counter are disposable, an orders table is precious, a
> 120 GB audit table does not fit in RAM at all. One global switch forces
> "everything is precious" or "nothing is", and the developer pays for the wrong
> one either way.
>
> **Rewritten 2026-08-27** to match what was designed and built. Two earlier
> drafts of this file described a three-valued `mode:` enum including `cold`;
> that design was replaced during the brainstorm and the history is at the
> bottom.
## The design, as built
Two optional `@table` arguments, because the developer is answering two
independent questions — *do I need this after a restart?* and *does it fit in
RAM?* A single enum would have forced a name for every combination, which is
what made the third value unwriteable before its mechanism existed.
| Argument | Values | Default | Meaning |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `durable` | `true`, `false` | `true` | `false` skips the WAL append entirely: no record, no fsync, ack from RAM, table empty after restart |
| `resident` | `all`, `keys` | `all` | `keys` keeps the id map, secondary indexes and unique shadows resident; rows are read back from the log by offset |
Both default to the pre-existing behaviour, which is why all 28 `@table`
declarations in the repository compiled unchanged and no golden moved.
`durable: false` with `resident: keys` is refused — rows would be neither
logged nor resident, so there would be nowhere to read them from.
The engine stays **one log-structured store**. The WAL already held every row;
this iteration stops discarding the payload. No second engine, no user-space row
cache — the kernel page cache is the hot copy, which is the position
`exploration/postgresql/buffer-and-checkpoint.md` already argued and the reason
the engine avoids `O_DIRECT`.
Principle 7 was amended for this: the log is authoritative, residency is a
declared per-table policy. Durability is untouched and unconditional.
## Progress
| # | Task | State |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | grammar: both arguments, defaults preserve behaviour | ✅ `69b7ce2` |
| 2 | WO-E224: refuse a durable `ref` into a volatile table | ✅ `753e6c4` |
| 3 | `.wob` v7: the class descriptor carries both properties | ✅ `7e68c99` |
| 4 | `durable: false` skips the WAL append and replay | ✅ `dd67e31` |
| 5a | `wo_wal_next_offset` — exact record offsets | ✅ `ac7d8af` |
| 5b | `wo_wal_read_row_at` — a row from a log offset | ✅ `d0c370c` |
| 5c | shared borrow/release accessor, then id→offset storage | ✅ `2e347de` (accessor, pure refactor, `db-bench --quick` 85/0), `18ce4d5` (offset storage), `f9c36ef` (insert + boot wiring) |
| 5d | rewire the readers: remaining `wo_row_ptr` sites, slab scans, FK restrict, `@unique` across the boundary | ✅ `11a92df` (db.c), + this commit (table.c, wal.c, compaction). Updates **refused**, not rewired — see below |
| 6 | the two runtime refusals (no-`WO_DATA`, the byte budget) | ⬜ |
| 7 | measure, gate, document, close out | ⬜ |
**The `durable` half is complete and usable.** A volatile table is a full table
in-process — same indexes, same `@unique`, same FK restrict, same query surface
— and is simply empty after a restart. That is what
[porch 1–3](../porch/01-store-backed-middleware.md) need for sessions,
rate-limit counters and idempotency keys.
**The `resident: keys` half has its read path but no storage behind it.**
Offsets can be captured and rows can be read back from them; nothing yet stores
a table that way.
## Acceptance Criteria
Met:
- **Given** every existing `@table` declaration, **when** compiled, **then**
behaviour is byte-identical. ✅ verified as `git diff` over
`compiler/test/golden/` being empty after a `WOC_BLESS` run — a green test
run alone proves nothing, since blessing rewrites every golden.
- **Given** `durable: false` with `WO_DATA` set, **when** rows are inserted,
**then** the WAL does not grow and the table is empty after a restart while
durable siblings replay. ✅ measured: 50 inserts wrote 1500 bytes durable and
**0** volatile. Measured against the file's non-zero prefix, because the file
is `fallocate`'d to 1 MiB and its size proves nothing.
- **Given** an unknown value, a repeated argument, a retired design word, or the
refused combination, **when** compiled, **then** WO-E102 with a message
naming what to write instead. ✅
- **Given** a `durable` table holding a `ref` into a volatile one, **when**
compiled, **then** WO-E224 naming both classes and both escapes. ✅ The
reverse direction and every `backlink` shape stay legal, pinned by a run
fixture so the check cannot grow over-broad.
- **Given** a WAL holding records for a class the source now declares volatile,
**when** the program starts, **then** it refuses, exits 2, names the class,
and is **not** reported as corruption. ✅
- **Given** a v6 image, **when** loaded, **then** refused on version rather
than misread. ✅
- **Given** a `resident: keys` table, **when** rows are read by id and scanned,
**then** every row is byte-identical including heap-valued columns. ✅ 5d.
Every read path goes through `wo_row_borrow`/`wo_row_release`, and the scans
go through `wo_row_next_id` — deliberately the id map for a keys table and
the bitmap for a resident one, since hash order would reorder every
unordered query.
- **Given** `@unique` on a `resident: keys` table, **when** a duplicate arrives
whose conflicting row is not resident, **then** it is refused. ✅ 5d. The
shadow probe borrows each bucket candidate, so the check costs one `pread`
per candidate — bounded by the bucket, not the table — and never silently
narrows to the resident subset.
- **Given** a `resident: keys` table and a WAL checkpoint, **when** the log is
compacted, **then** every such row survives and still reads correctly. ✅ 5d,
and this is the obligation databasev2 3 left behind. Two independent ways to
fail it, both pinned by `test_keys_resident_survives_compaction`: compaction
walked the *bitmap*, which a keys row has no bit in, so every one of them
would have been dropped from the new log; and the id map would still have
named offsets into the replaced file. Rows are rewritten in hash order, so
offsets genuinely move and a missing re-point cannot pass by luck.
Outstanding:
- **Given** a `delete` of a row on a `resident: keys` table, **when** it runs,
**then** the row is gone and nothing else is touched. ✅ **fixed 2026-08-29,
and it was memory corruption before the fix.** `wo_row_remove` read the id
map's value as a slot, but on a keys table that value is a LOG OFFSET, and
`slot_row` does no bounds check — so a delete indexed the slab array with a
byte offset and then freed whatever it landed on. Pinned by
`test_keys_resident_delete`, which SEGVs against the old code. The same
latent trap in `wo_row_ptr` is closed too: it now returns NULL rather than a
wild pointer when the value is an offset.
**This is why the loader refusal earns its keep.** The gap was not one
missing operation but a second one that corrupted memory silently, found
only by auditing every reader of the id map.
- **Given** an `update` to a row on a `resident: keys` table, **when** it runs,
**then** it is applied. ❌ **refused explicitly** by
`wo_row_update_field{,_slot}`. A keys row lives in the log with no slab slot
to mutate; writing into the borrow's scratch would discard the write
*silently*, which is the one failure this iteration must not ship. Doing it
properly is read-modify-**append** — a new record, then re-point the offset —
and that is its own piece of work. **The loader's refusal of `resident: keys`
stays until it lands**, so no program can reach the half-feature.
- **Given** `durable: true` and no `WO_DATA`, **when** the program starts,
**then** it refuses. *(task 6 — today this combination silently discards
every write)*
- **Given** the resident footprint crossing the budget, **when** it does,
**then** a refusal naming the table and the annotation. *(task 6)*
- **Given** the `resident: all` read baseline, **when** re-measured, **then**
inside tolerance — no cost for a feature not used. *(task 7)*
- **Given** a `resident: keys` table larger than RAM, **when** read randomly,
**then** its read cost is **measured against the resident baseline on its own
read path**, not inherited from databasev2 1's swap figure. *(task 7)* — that
figure is **273×** for demand-paged anonymous memory
([1](01-ram-ceiling-measurement.md)); `pread` through the page cache should do
better, and the whole value of `resident: keys` rests on how much better. If it
is not materially better than swapping, the design buys nothing that the
kernel was not already doing.
## Out Of Scope
- **Checkpoint and compaction** — [3](03-wal-checkpoint.md). Boot rebuilds the
offset map by scanning the log until that lands, which is O(all history);
3's snapshot should persist the map.
- **Eviction and a resident row cache** — [5](05-bounded-tables-eviction.md).
This iteration's tables are either fully resident or keys-only.
- **io_uring on the read path** — a real question that only exists after this;
noted in [4](04-io-uring-commit.md), deliberately not folded in.
- **`transaction { }` and `@table` feature flags** — language
[iteration 18](../language-runtime-database/18-memory-db-features.md),
approved spec, left whole.
- **Per-shard residency for volatile tables** — a volatile table has no WAL, so
it arguably need not live on the owner shard at all. Faster, and a different
consistency story. Recorded as a candidate, not decided.
- **Converting an existing dataset between settings.** Refuse on mismatch, do
not convert — implemented in task 4.
## Info — the forks, settled
1. **Two keys, not one enum.** An enum needs a name per *combination*, and the
brainstorm demonstrated the third name is unwriteable before its mechanism is
decided.
2. **`keys`, not `index`.** `index:` is already an argument key, so
`@table(index: [c], resident: index)` read badly. `all`/`keys` also put both
values on one axis — what row data stays resident. `resident: none` was
rejected as overclaiming, since the indexes are very much resident.
3. **Optional with `durable` defaulting true**, not mandatory. Mandatory would
have touched 28 declarations, 13 corpus fixtures and 3 goldens; the README
already says nothing is API-stable, so making it mandatory at 1.0 stays
available.
4. **`@unique` on `resident: keys` is allowed**, with its index unconditionally
resident. Roughly doubles the resident index; stated at the declaration so
the cost is visible.
5. **The budget is bytes, not rows** — a text-heavy row and an Int-only row
differ by 3.3× (measured, databasev2 1), so a row count cannot bound RAM.
## History — two corrections worth keeping
**The three-mode design was replaced.** Earlier drafts had
`mode: ram | durable | cold`. `cold` conflated two independent properties and
could not be named honestly before its mechanism existed, and the developer's
120 GB-on-32 GB case showed the real axis was residency. Replaced by two keys,
and principle 7 amended rather than worked around.
**The "one real rewrite" was fiction.** The spec claimed the on-disk record was
pointer-bearing and that re-encoding it was this iteration's substantive
engineering. That came from reading `table.c`'s `db_val_encode` — which builds
the *in-memory slot* — and inferring the file format from it. `wal.c`'s
`enc_val` has been flat since iteration 9. The task was deleted, not reduced.
**The opposite half then turned out to be genuinely deep.** With the format
fine, the plan's storage steps still read as plumbing. Measured instead:
`wo_row_ptr` returns a `db_row *` into a slab and has 11 call sites, `table.c`
has 37 slab references, `db.c:105-181` walks slabs for scans, `enc_val`
serialises *from* the slab, and **no operation exists that drops a row's payload
while keeping its index entries**. Hence the 5a–5d split. 5c and 5d need their
own write-ups, and the two open design questions for 5c are whether the id hash
stores offsets in place of slot indices or gains a parallel map, and what the
new operation does about the unique shadows, which currently point at slots.