- Board renamed docs/plan/00-kanban.md -> docs/00-status.md and rebuilt: ▶ NEXT PLAN pointer (iteration 4 — emitter, corpus, `woc build`) then six buckets — stories, in progress, done, pending, discarded, learnings. It covered only the Rust runtime before, so the whole OOP track was invisible. All 16 inbound refs repointed; `Kanban:` banners renamed to `Status:`. - New discarded.md (settled rejections with reasons: inheritance, `abstract`, Money/SKU/Float, Dynamic/cast/macro/extern, AOT-to-C, Menhir, shared engine state) and learnings.md (plumbed≠enforced, vacuous goldens, exit-0-wrong- output, malloc-path ASan trick, deferred checks that never reach the VM). - RECOVERED docs/plan/exploration/blue-green-vm/00-vision.md — gone from disk, never committed (gitignored path), cited by five docs incl. principle 12. Root cause was broader: all seven forward-roadmap plans in docs/superpowers/plans/ were untracked and ignored, on one disk only. Dropped the docs ignore rules with a do-not-re-add note; added __pycache__/*.pyc. - Repaired broken links across docs/, 270 -> 36: fixes a regression from the earlier reference/ -> .dev/reference/ move (relative paths at ../../ and deeper were skipped), plus depth and reorg drift. The 36 residual point at content that does not exist and need decisions, not paths. - New spec docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-10-logwatcher-gap-closure-design.md, applied: `and`/`or` verdict row; Part 3 gains `env` (six modules), swaps time.mono for iso/local, adds 22 bare core builtins; throw/time.mono/is cut (0 uses in the sample). Plan 8: Task 2 gains and/or, Task 5 drops throw, abstract+`is` task deleted, 8/9 renumber to 7/8. Plan 9 gains core builtins. Plan 10 gains the 307 -> 0 diagnostic gate. WO-E205 re-filed unreachable-by- design. types.ml header drops its false satisfaction-set claim. 00-code- review.md reduced to a stub — its rival Phase 1-4 roadmap retired.
182 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
182 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
# AI Agents and Content Management
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
AI agents (Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, custom agents) work within a specific project or working directory. Their sessions, context, and understanding are scoped to that directory. This works well when projects are completely different domains.
|
|
|
|
But writeonce content is not isolated — articles reference each other, share tags, build on concepts from other articles. An agent editing `gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor.md` would benefit from knowing that `auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance.md` exists and covers related infrastructure. Without explicit mappings, the agent treats each article as an island.
|
|
|
|
## Problem
|
|
|
|
1. **Agents lack cross-article awareness.** When asked to write or update an article about Kubernetes, the agent doesn't know that related articles about Docker, CI/CD, or AWS already exist in the content directory — unless it manually searches.
|
|
|
|
2. **No semantic grouping.** Tags provide flat categorization (`kubernetes`, `ci-cd`), but they don't express relationships: "this article is a prerequisite for that one", "these three articles form a series", "this article supersedes that one."
|
|
|
|
3. **Context window waste.** Without mappings, the agent must scan all articles to find related content. With explicit mappings, it can load exactly the relevant files.
|
|
|
|
## Solution: Metadata-Driven Content Mappings
|
|
|
|
Users define relationships between articles in the JSON metadata. These mappings serve two purposes:
|
|
|
|
1. **Human navigation** — rendered as "related articles" links on the site
|
|
2. **Agent context** — when an agent works on an article, it loads the mapped articles into its context for cross-referencing
|
|
|
|
### Mapping Fields in JSON Metadata
|
|
|
|
Per [06-markdown-render.md](../06-markdown-render.md), the JSON metadata is minimal. Add a `mappings` field:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sys_title": "gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor",
|
|
"title": "Gitlab Runner with Kubernetes Executor",
|
|
"published": true,
|
|
"author": "Shoney Arickathil",
|
|
"tags": ["kubernetes", "gitlab", "ci-cd"],
|
|
"published_on": 1740950884,
|
|
"mappings": {
|
|
"related": ["auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance"],
|
|
"prerequisite": ["linux-misc"],
|
|
"series": {
|
|
"name": "gitlab-runner",
|
|
"order": 2
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Mapping Types
|
|
|
|
| Type | Meaning | Agent Use |
|
|
| -------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| `related` | Topically related articles | Agent loads these for cross-reference when editing |
|
|
| `prerequisite` | Articles the reader should read first | Agent ensures no concept duplication, references prerequisites instead of re-explaining |
|
|
| `series` | Articles that form an ordered sequence | Agent maintains narrative continuity across the series |
|
|
| `supersedes` | This article replaces an older one | Agent can mark the old article as outdated or unpublished |
|
|
| `references` | External articles or URLs the content builds on | Agent checks links are still valid, cites them properly |
|
|
|
|
### Directory Structure with Mappings
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
content/
|
|
gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor/
|
|
gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor.json # metadata + mappings
|
|
gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor.md # full article
|
|
auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance/
|
|
auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance.json
|
|
auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance.md
|
|
linux-misc/
|
|
linux-misc.json
|
|
linux-misc.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Agent Workflows
|
|
|
|
### 1. Writing a New Article
|
|
|
|
The author asks an agent: "Write an article about deploying GitLab Runner on ECS."
|
|
|
|
The agent:
|
|
|
|
1. Scans the content directory for existing articles with tags `gitlab`, `ci-cd`, `aws`
|
|
2. Finds `gitlab-runner-with-kubernetes-executor` and `auto-scale-gitlab-runner-using-aws-spot-instance`
|
|
3. Reads their `.md` files to understand what's already covered
|
|
4. Writes the new article, referencing existing articles rather than re-explaining shared concepts
|
|
5. Suggests `mappings.related` entries for the new article's JSON
|
|
|
|
### 2. Updating an Existing Article
|
|
|
|
The author asks: "Update the Kubernetes executor article with the new runner token format."
|
|
|
|
The agent:
|
|
|
|
1. Reads the article's JSON metadata and `.md` content
|
|
2. Reads the `mappings.related` articles to check for consistency
|
|
3. Makes the update in the `.md` file
|
|
4. Checks if the change affects any prerequisite or series articles
|
|
5. inotify detects the `.md` change → store rebuilds → subscribers notified
|
|
|
|
### 3. Content Audit
|
|
|
|
The author asks: "Which articles reference outdated AWS configurations?"
|
|
|
|
The agent:
|
|
|
|
1. Loads all article metadata (the Store already indexes everything)
|
|
2. Follows `mappings` to build a dependency graph
|
|
3. Reads the `.md` files of articles tagged with `aws`
|
|
4. Identifies outdated patterns (old SDK versions, deprecated services)
|
|
5. Reports findings with links to specific articles and line numbers
|
|
|
|
### 4. Series Management
|
|
|
|
The author asks: "Add a new part to the gitlab-runner series."
|
|
|
|
The agent:
|
|
|
|
1. Finds all articles with `mappings.series.name == "gitlab-runner"`
|
|
2. Reads them in order to understand the narrative arc
|
|
3. Writes the new article continuing from where the series left off
|
|
4. Sets `mappings.series.order` to the next number
|
|
5. Updates the previous article's mappings to reference the new one
|
|
|
|
## Integration with writeonce Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Store Index
|
|
|
|
Add a mappings index alongside the existing title, date, and tag indexes:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
data/
|
|
articles.seg
|
|
index/
|
|
title.idx
|
|
date.idx
|
|
tags.idx
|
|
mappings.idx # sys_title → related sys_titles
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The mappings index allows efficient traversal: "give me all articles related to X" without scanning every article's JSON.
|
|
|
|
### Template Rendering
|
|
|
|
The `article.htmlx` template can render related articles:
|
|
|
|
```html
|
|
<article>
|
|
<h1>{{article.title}}</h1>
|
|
{{article.content_html}} {{#each article.related}}
|
|
<aside class="related">
|
|
<h3>Related</h3>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="/blog/{{sys_title}}">{{title}}</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</aside>
|
|
{{/each}}
|
|
</article>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Subscription
|
|
|
|
When a mapped article changes, subscribers to related articles can optionally be notified. If article A lists article B in `mappings.related`, and article B is updated, subscribers to article A can receive a notification that related content changed.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Configuration
|
|
|
|
For agents to use the mappings effectively, the project can include an agent instruction file (e.g., `CLAUDE.md` or `.agent/instructions.md`):
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Content Management
|
|
|
|
- Articles are in `content/{sys_title}/{sys_title}.md`
|
|
- Metadata is in `content/{sys_title}/{sys_title}.json`
|
|
- Before writing or editing an article, read its `mappings` field and load related articles for context
|
|
- When creating a new article, suggest appropriate `mappings` based on tags and content overlap
|
|
- Maintain narrative continuity within `series` mappings
|
|
- Do not duplicate explanations that exist in `prerequisite` articles — reference them instead
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This turns the content directory into an agent-navigable knowledge graph where the metadata provides the edges and the markdown files provide the nodes.
|
|
|
|
## queryable graph database
|
|
|
|
- traversable knowledge graphs available on RAM.
|
|
- which linux kernels, develop in C ++. User wants to learn it.
|