shoney.arickathil
2a4c304378
- done/ (11): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7b, 9, 9b, 15, 16 — landed iterations (9/9b remainders live in the post-12 drain list, not in the files) - refine/ (8): 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, 9g, 11, 13, 14 — everything marked "no spec yet / brainstorm before planning" - root keeps: 00-story (index), 05 (partial, plan 8 open), 8/10/12 (specs or plans exist), 17 (parked, spec+plan approved), 18 (next) - every cross-reference re-pathed and VERIFIED resolving: board, specs, plans, employee-list README, story table, intra-story links (moved files' relative links deepened one level; done/7b's 9e pointer now crosses to refine/) - pre-existing dead link noted, not touched: refine/11-fibers.md points at docs/plan/exploration/fibers/00-fibers.md which does not exist (predates the move) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
49 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
# Iteration 1 — the principles doc
|
|
|
|
> Format: `product/story-iteration-template`. Part of
|
|
> [Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary](../00-story.md).
|
|
|
|
## Goals
|
|
|
|
- The repo gains `docs/00-principles.md`: one page stating the twelve
|
|
writeonce principles — the doctrine every later iteration links back to
|
|
instead of re-arguing.
|
|
- The twelve: one binary is the whole system; zero dependencies (kernel
|
|
primitives only); memory safety without a GC tax (MVS ownership, opt-in
|
|
`@gc`, per-shard collection); no inheritance ever; thread-per-core shards
|
|
with ownership moves; the runtime never stops (blue-green slots, embedded
|
|
source); RAM authoritative + WAL durable; samples force the grammar;
|
|
Linux is the target; capabilities are typed builtins (no FFI); plain
|
|
diagnostics are the product; the runtime is a recipe box.
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
- What to achieve?
|
|
- **Given** a new contributor opening `docs/`,
|
|
- **when** they read `docs/00-principles.md`,
|
|
- **then** each principle is a short statement plus a one-line why plus
|
|
a link to the spec or doc that enforces it, and no principle
|
|
contradicts a locked spec decision.
|
|
- What to achieve?
|
|
- **Given** CLAUDE.md's "Where to read next" list,
|
|
- **when** the iteration lands,
|
|
- **then** it contains one pointer line to the principles doc and
|
|
nothing else about it changed.
|
|
|
|
## Out Of Scope
|
|
|
|
- Rewriting or relocating existing doctrine text in specs/plans — the doc
|
|
links, it does not duplicate.
|
|
- Any `.wo` example content (iterations 2+ own code-adjacent artifacts).
|
|
|
|
## Info
|
|
|
|
- `docs/` numbering starts at `01-problem.md`; the `00-` slot is free and
|
|
reads as "start here".
|
|
- Spec governing this slice: `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-07-logwatcher-sample-and-principles-design.md` §3.
|
|
|
|
## Proposed Solution
|
|
|
|
- Author the page with the twelve principles in the order listed in the
|
|
governing spec; verify every link resolves; add the CLAUDE.md pointer
|
|
line; record the commit draft in `.dev/commit.md`.
|