writeonce/docs/stories/language-runtime-database/26-blue-green-deploy.md
shoney.arickathil c0b0dbb846 docs: audit all markdown against the code, fix findings, flatten status folders
- README: shipped concurrency/HTTP/WebSockets sat in the roadmap as "not yet
  available"; "no package manager" contradicted [deps]; the deps example
  would not have compiled (the key IS the module name)
- runtime/README: leads with wovm, wo-rt.c demoted to a historical section;
  dropped 2 nonexistent recipes, crates/rt, @gc refcounting, 13 suites -> 18
- employee + log-watcher READMEs claimed "does not compile"; both are gates
- error catalog: +10 emitted codes incl WO-E250, the only diagnostic the
  shipped query surface raises; recorded why the sweep rotted
- language-surface: group-by parses, then the typechecker refuses it
- 00-code-review + 00-link-audit re-run; history kept, not rewritten
- 48 dead Rust-era exploration links de-linked rather than re-pointed (their
  prose names the retired plan by number); successor map -> discarded.md
- 08-project-structure: compiler/plan/ never existed; corpus has 9 dirs, 5 empty
- releasing.md: dropped a --draft step the workflow never had
- new docs/00-doc-audit.md: findings + disposition, incl one row where the
  audit was wrong and the doc it accused was right
- status folders removed: 34 stories flat, status only in frontmatter; 252
  links recomputed from resolved paths; board/board-views/structure retaught
- story 24 -> in-progress, since frontmatter is now the only truth
- new iteration 38: fs mutation verbs + net.connect, the two capability
  families no iteration owned
- new iteration 39: gofiber/fiber v3.5.0 parity study. The ledger called
  CSRF/sessions unblocked by iteration 34's HMAC, but the runtime has no
  source of randomness at all
- linkcheck skips .dev/.superpowers: 0 broken paths, 0 bad anchors

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 19:20:22 +02:00

3 KiB
Raw Blame History

iteration status
26 hold

Iteration 26 — blue-green in-runtime deployment

Format: product/story-iteration-template. Part of Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary.

Goals

  • The story's closing promise: the running binary updates its own code. Two fixed VM slots (activity alternating); a proposal pipeline — propose → approve → in-runtime compile → additive schema migration → load → health → atomic switch — with the previous version staying resident as the instant rollback target.
  • The developer drives it remotely: wo remote pull / propose / diff / approve / rollback / status over a loopback management transport, every stage streaming live and WAL-audited.

Acceptance Criteria

  • What to achieve?
    • Given a running fixture app and an additive code+schema change,
    • when the developer proposes and approves it,
    • then the deploy completes with zero dropped requests (in-flight work — including parked fibers — drains on the old slot through iteration 11's unwind path), and the binary's embedded source trailer matches the new active version afterward.
  • What to achieve?
    • Given a failure at any pipeline stage (compile diagnostic, destructive-change rejection, load failure, health failure, drain timeout),
    • when it occurs,
    • then the active slot keeps serving untouched, the failure is visible in the SSE stream and the WAL trail, and a destructive change was rejected at propose time naming the offending declaration.
  • What to achieve?
    • Given a completed deploy,
    • when wo remote rollback runs,
    • then the previous version serves again in under one second with no compile and no data change — additive-only migration guarantees old code runs correctly against the migrated schema.
  • What to achieve?
    • Given kill -9 during COMPILING / MIGRATING / SWITCHING / trailer-rewrite,
    • when the unit restarts,
    • then it serves one consistent version and the WAL shows whole migrations only.

Out Of Scope

  • Script-based/destructive migrations, in-runtime editing workspace, MCP/agent wrapper over the management plane — all recorded follow-ups.
  • New scheduler work — fibers landed in iteration 11; this iteration's drain unwinds parked fibers through 11's shutdown path, it does not extend it.

Info

  • Approved spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-03-blue-green-vm-design.md; its implementation plan is deliberately authored only after iterations 9–10 ship (prerequisites: a catalog to diff, HTTP machinery to build on).
  • VMs own code; the engine owns data — the separation that makes the switch cheap and rollback unconditional.

Proposed Solution

  • Author the implementation plan from the approved spec once iterations 9–10 land, then execute it (slots, deploy state machine, additive differ, management surface + SSE, wo remote verbs, crash battery).