writeonce/docs/examples/db-bench/README.md
shoney.arickathil f66aa680a9 feat(db-bench): sample — serial modes, histogram stats (T2)
- seed/read/query/write/wal/verify/verify-acked + all (one-process
  campaign: RAM store dies with the process)
- per-op time.ticks, 1us-bucket histogram percentiles (reservoir
  deviation: no element-write/sort in language; better tail anyway)
- Meta expectation rows ride the same WAL verify checks
- finding: hand-built multi<TableClass> SEGVs on drop (elems classed
  OWNED, refs are scalar ids) — worked around, recorded
- finding: reads ~1.6k/s p50 595us vs 287k/s inserts — probe walks
  all slabs; the number 22 exists to surface

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 16:18:26 +02:00

42 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

# db-bench — iteration 22's load generator
The measurement backbone (spec:
`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-21-db-bench-design.md`). Pure `.wo`;
every measured mode prints one machine-parsable line per operation
class:
<op> <count> <ops/sec> <p50us> <p99us>
Timing is per-operation via `time.ticks` (CLOCK_MONOTONIC µs).
Percentiles come from a 1µs-bucket histogram clamped at 20000µs — exact
to the microsecond below the clamp; a p99 AT 20000 means "clamp or
worse". (A histogram, not the spec's reservoir: the language has no
container element-write or sort, and the histogram's tail fidelity is
strictly better. Recorded as a plan deviation.)
## Modes
| mode | what it prices |
| --- | --- |
| `all N` | the throughput campaign in ONE process: seed N, read N/2, query N/10, write N/2. Without `WO_DATA` the store is RAM and dies with the process, so the measured modes must share the seeding run. |
| `seed N` | timed inserts: one parent per 100 children (FK probe each insert, unique-index maintenance per parent), k non-unique (10 rows/key), deterministic v. Writes `Meta` expectation rows. |
| `read N` | indexed take-1 point lookups, LCG-spread keys. |
| `query N` | full equality probes on the k index (≈10 rows each), materialized and counted. |
| `write N` | alternating inserts (disjoint k range 2e6+) and updates through query results. Corrupts the checksum by design — durability legs run on a fresh store. |
| `wal N` | the crash battery's vehicle: insert-only (k range 1e6+), `acked <i>` printed AFTER each insert returns — the return IS the ack (RAM applied, WAL record staged, ONE commit done). |
| `verify` | store vs its own Meta rows: count, checksum, one unique probe. Exit 3 on mismatch. |
| `verify-acked M` | after kill -9 mid-`wal`: rows 1..M exist with the right v; rows beyond M allowed (acked after the last print flushed). Exit 3 on mismatch. |
## Coordination idiom (this side of iteration 31)
There is no request/response surface yet: concurrent modes drive
completion the db-actor way — actors write rows, main polls the store
until the expected count, then settles. Retired when 31 lands.
## Standing finding (2026-08-21, first run)
A hand-built `multi Bucket` of insert results SEGVs on drop: the
compiler classifies the elements OWNED while table refs are scalar ids.
Query-built multis are runtime-typed and safe. Worked around here
(single ref local, bucket-major seeding); the compiler fix is its own
slice.