writeonce/docs/guides/releasing.md
shoney.arickathil cfe81cf8d0 ci: release workflow — no gh auth login, tag-triggered
- .github/workflows/release.yml: builds, verifies and publishes on a
  `v*` tag. `permissions: contents: write` on the injected
  GITHUB_TOKEN replaces `gh auth login`; no PAT, nothing to rotate
- runs-on ubuntu-22.04 DELIBERATELY: the build host's glibc caps which
  symbol versions the binaries import, and that cap is the floor every
  user needs. 22.04 (2.35) includes Ubuntu 22.04 / Debian 12 / RHEL 9;
  24.04 (2.39) would exclude them
- guards that fail instead of publishing: tag vs VERSION, produced
  asset name vs the filename /install links, sha256, and a smoke test
  that builds a hello project with the binaries INSIDE the tarball
- reports the shipped glibc floor so the claim on /install is checkable
  from a build log
- releasing.md: pipeline route up front, manual route kept; GH_TOKEN
  recipe for non-GitHub CI

Not run — this repo has no CI history and Actions cannot execute
locally. Every guard's shell was dry-run here against the real dist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 04:58:40 +02:00

270 lines
9.4 KiB
Markdown

# Cutting a release — building the tarball and publishing it on GitHub
The `/install` page on writeonce.de links a GitHub release asset by an
exact URL. Publishing is therefore not "upload a file somewhere": the
**asset filename has to match what the site links**, or the download
button 404s. This runbook keeps the two in step.
The URL the site links today:
```
https://github.com/shoneyj/writeonce/releases/download/v0.1.0/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz
```
which decomposes as `<repo>/releases/download/<tag>/<asset-name>`. So the
tag must be `v0.1.0` and the asset must be named exactly
`writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz` — which is what `just dist` already
produces.
## Two routes
**Automated (preferred).** `.github/workflows/release.yml` builds,
verifies and publishes on a `v*` tag push. It needs no `gh auth login`
and no secret: GitHub injects a per-job `GITHUB_TOKEN`, and the single
line `permissions: contents: write` is what lets that token create a
release. The token expires when the job ends, so there is nothing to
rotate or leak. Skip to *Releasing from the pipeline* below.
**Manual.** Everything from §0 onward — the path for a first release, or
when the pipeline is broken and you need to ship anyway.
## Releasing from the pipeline
```
git tag -a v0.1.0 -m "writeonce 0.1.0"
git push origin v0.1.0
```
That is the whole release. The workflow then, in order: checks the tag
matches `VERSION`, builds via `scripts/mkdist.sh`, asserts the produced
filename is the one `/install` links, verifies the `.sha256`, extracts
the tarball and builds a hello project **with the binaries inside it**,
prints the glibc floor of what is about to ship, and publishes both
files with `gh release create`.
Two things about that file are deliberate:
- **`runs-on: ubuntu-22.04`, not `ubuntu-latest`.** The binaries link
glibc dynamically, so the build host's glibc caps the symbol versions
they can import — and that cap becomes the minimum glibc every user
needs. On 24.04 (glibc 2.39) the floor is 2.39; on 22.04 (2.35) it is
2.35. That is the difference between excluding and including Ubuntu
22.04, Debian 12 and RHEL 9. Changing the image changes who can run
the release, so change `install/view.wo`'s supported-systems list in
the same commit.
- **It fails rather than publishes** when the tag, `VERSION` and the
asset name disagree, because those three are what the download URL on
`/install` is built from.
### Other CI (GitLab, Jenkins, Buildkite)
No `gh auth login` there either — `gh` reads a token from the
environment:
```
GH_TOKEN=$MY_SECRET gh release create v0.1.0 dist/*.tar.gz dist/*.sha256
```
The secret is a PAT with `repo` scope (classic) or **Contents: read and
write** (fine-grained). Outside GitHub it is a long-lived credential you
own and must rotate — which is exactly the cost `GITHUB_TOKEN` avoids,
and the reason to prefer Actions for this one job even if the rest of
your CI lives elsewhere.
## 0. Authenticate `gh` (manual route only)
`gh` keeps its own credential, separate from git's. SSH keys let you
`git push`; they do **not** let `gh` call the API, so a machine that
pushes fine can still fail to create a release.
Check first — if this names your account, skip the rest of this section:
```
gh auth status
```
### The interactive flow (what to pick)
```
gh auth login
```
It asks five things:
| prompt | answer |
| --- | --- |
| What account do you want to log into? | **GitHub.com** |
| Preferred protocol for Git operations? | **SSH** — this repo's remote is already `git@github.com:shoneyJ/writeonce.git`, and answering HTTPS here rewrites how git talks to GitHub for every repo on the host |
| Upload your SSH public key? | pick `~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub`, or **Skip** if that key is already on your account |
| How would you like to authenticate? | **Login with a web browser** |
| One-time code | gh prints something like `ABCD-1234`; press Enter, paste it at <https://github.com/login/device>, authorise |
The token lands in the system credential store, or in a plain file if
there is no store (`gh auth status` prints the location; `--insecure-storage`
forces the file). `-w`/`--web` skips straight to the browser step.
**In a Claude Code session, prefix it with `!`** — `! gh auth login` — so
the prompts are yours to answer and the output lands in the conversation.
An agent cannot complete a device flow on your behalf.
### No browser on that machine (server, container, CI)
Create a personal access token at <https://github.com/settings/tokens>.
Classic tokens need the scopes `repo`, `read:org` and `gist`;
a fine-grained token needs **Contents: read and write** on the repo,
which is what release assets are written through. Then:
```
printf '%s' "$TOKEN" | gh auth login --with-token
```
Read it from a `chmod 600` file rather than typing it inline — an
argument on the command line lands in shell history and in `ps`. For
automation, skip login entirely and export `GH_TOKEN`; gh picks it up and
stores nothing.
### Verify before you rely on it
```
gh auth status
gh repo view shoneyJ/writeonce --json name,visibility
```
The second call is the real check: it proves the token can reach *this*
repo, which a valid-but-wrong-account token would not.
## 1. Before you build
Check the tree is clean and the version is what you mean to ship —
`VERSION` is the single source, and `mkdist.sh` refuses to build if
`woc version` or `wovm --version` disagree with it:
```
git status --porcelain # expect empty
cat VERSION # e.g. 0.1.0
```
## 2. Build the artifact
```
just dist
```
That builds both release binaries, runs the version drift guard, and
writes two files:
```
dist/writeonce-<ver>-linux-amd64.tar.gz
dist/writeonce-<ver>-linux-amd64.tar.gz.sha256
```
## 3. Verify it before anyone else can
Two checks, both cheap, both worth it. First the digest:
```
cd dist && sha256sum -c writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz.sha256 && cd ..
```
Then prove the tarball actually works, using the binaries INSIDE it —
not the ones in your build tree:
```
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
tar -C "$tmp" -xzf dist/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz
export PATH="$tmp/writeonce/bin:$PATH"
woc version && wovm --version
mkdir -p "$tmp/hello" && cd "$tmp/hello"
printf 'name = "hello"\nversion = "0.1.0"\n\n[runtime]\nwo = ">= 0.1"\n' > wo.toml
printf 'fn main() -> Int {\n print("hello, writeonce");\n return 0;\n}\n' > main.wo
woc . && ./target/hello
```
If that prints `hello, writeonce`, the release is sound.
## 4. Tag the commit
The tag is what the download URL points at, so tag the exact commit the
binaries were built from:
```
git tag -a v0.1.0 -m "writeonce 0.1.0"
git push origin v0.1.0
```
## 5. Publish and upload
One command creates the release and attaches both files:
```
gh release create v0.1.0 \
dist/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz \
dist/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz.sha256 \
--title "writeonce 0.1.0" \
--notes-file - <<'EOF'
Linux x86-64, glibc 2.38 or newer. Two binaries — `woc` and `wovm` —
depending only on the system C library.
rm -rf /usr/local/writeonce
tar -C /usr/local -xzf writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/writeonce/bin
Verify with the published `.sha256` before extracting.
EOF
```
Add `--draft` to stage it without publishing, or `--prerelease` to mark
it as one. If the release already exists and you only need to attach (or
replace) files:
```
gh release upload v0.1.0 dist/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz --clobber
```
Without `gh`, the same thing through the web UI: the repo's **Releases**
page → *Draft a new release* → choose tag `v0.1.0` → drag both files
into the attachment box → *Publish release*. Uploading by hand is where
the filename usually drifts, so paste it rather than retyping it.
## 6. Check the link the site actually uses
```
curl -sIL -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code} %{url_effective}\n' \
https://github.com/shoneyj/writeonce/releases/download/v0.1.0/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz
```
A `200` means `/install`'s download button works for a stranger. Anything
else means the tag, the asset name, or the repo path disagrees with the
link in `docs/examples/site/install/view.wo`.
## 7. Refresh the site's mirror
`/install` offers this site as a mirror beside the GitHub link, served by
the framework's `StaticFiles` out of `$WO_DIST` (default `./dist`). Copy
the same two files there so the mirror is not stale:
```
scp dist/writeonce-0.1.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz* user@host:/srv/writeonce/dist/
```
Both copies are the same bytes, and the published `.sha256` covers
either one — that is the point of shipping the digest beside the
archive.
## Notes
- **`dist/` is gitignored** (`.gitignore:103`). The tarball is a build
artifact; the release is where it lives, not the repository.
- **Repo path case.** The git remote is `shoneyJ/writeonce` while the
site links `shoneyj/writeonce`. GitHub paths are case-insensitive and
redirect, so both resolve — but keep them consistent when either
changes.
- **Bumping the version** means editing `VERSION`, rebuilding, and
updating every place the site names the current release:
`docs/examples/site/install/view.wo` (the download links, the tar
command, and the `.sha256` link). The version appears there as literal
text, so grep for the old number before you publish.
- **One target today.** `mkdist.sh` builds `linux-amd64` only; a cross
matrix is future work. Do not add architectures to the release notes
that no build produces.