- README: shipped concurrency/HTTP/WebSockets sat in the roadmap as "not yet available"; "no package manager" contradicted [deps]; the deps example would not have compiled (the key IS the module name) - runtime/README: leads with wovm, wo-rt.c demoted to a historical section; dropped 2 nonexistent recipes, crates/rt, @gc refcounting, 13 suites -> 18 - employee + log-watcher READMEs claimed "does not compile"; both are gates - error catalog: +10 emitted codes incl WO-E250, the only diagnostic the shipped query surface raises; recorded why the sweep rotted - language-surface: group-by parses, then the typechecker refuses it - 00-code-review + 00-link-audit re-run; history kept, not rewritten - 48 dead Rust-era exploration links de-linked rather than re-pointed (their prose names the retired plan by number); successor map -> discarded.md - 08-project-structure: compiler/plan/ never existed; corpus has 9 dirs, 5 empty - releasing.md: dropped a --draft step the workflow never had - new docs/00-doc-audit.md: findings + disposition, incl one row where the audit was wrong and the doc it accused was right - status folders removed: 34 stories flat, status only in frontmatter; 252 links recomputed from resolved paths; board/board-views/structure retaught - story 24 -> in-progress, since frontmatter is now the only truth - new iteration 38: fs mutation verbs + net.connect, the two capability families no iteration owned - new iteration 39: gofiber/fiber v3.5.0 parity study. The ledger called CSRF/sessions unblocked by iteration 34's HMAC, but the runtime has no source of randomness at all - linkcheck skips .dev/.superpowers: 0 broken paths, 0 bad anchors Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 KiB
2 KiB
| iteration | status |
|---|---|
| 1 | done |
Iteration 1 — the principles doc
Format:
product/story-iteration-template. Part of Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary.
Goals
- The repo gains
docs/00-principles.md: one page stating the twelve writeonce principles — the doctrine every later iteration links back to instead of re-arguing. - The twelve: one binary is the whole system; zero dependencies (kernel
primitives only); memory safety without a GC tax (MVS ownership, opt-in
@gc, per-shard collection); no inheritance ever; thread-per-core shards with ownership moves; the runtime never stops (blue-green slots, embedded source); RAM authoritative + WAL durable; samples force the grammar; Linux is the target; capabilities are typed builtins (no FFI); plain diagnostics are the product; the runtime is a recipe box.
Acceptance Criteria
- What to achieve?
- Given a new contributor opening
docs/, - when they read
docs/00-principles.md, - then each principle is a short statement plus a one-line why plus a link to the spec or doc that enforces it, and no principle contradicts a locked spec decision.
- Given a new contributor opening
- What to achieve?
- Given CLAUDE.md's "Where to read next" list,
- when the iteration lands,
- then it contains one pointer line to the principles doc and nothing else about it changed.
Out Of Scope
- Rewriting or relocating existing doctrine text in specs/plans — the doc links, it does not duplicate.
- Any
.woexample content (iterations 2+ own code-adjacent artifacts).
Info
docs/numbering starts at01-problem.md; the00-slot is free and reads as "start here".- Spec governing this slice:
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-07-logwatcher-sample-and-principles-design.md§3.
Proposed Solution
- Author the page with the twelve principles in the order listed in the
governing spec; verify every link resolves; add the CLAUDE.md pointer
line; record the commit draft in
.dev/commit.md.