writeonce/docs/stories/databasev2/07-single-file-db.md
shoney.arickathil 746dc2b42b docs(databasev2): third track — the database beyond RAM, with per-table storage modes
- docs/stories/databasev2/, numbered from 1. Six PENDING database iterations
  moved from the language track and renumbered, keeping the old id in
  `was_language_iteration:` so a search for "iteration 32" still finds it:
  32 -> 3 WAL checkpoint, 23 -> 4 io_uring commit, 33 -> 7 single-file store,
  27 -> 8 query grammar, 20 -> 9 cross-program, 21 -> 10 keypair auth.
  Done work (9, 9b, 22) stays as v1 history; language 18 left whole
- the problem, read off the engine not guessed: rows are malloc'd slabs with
  addresses stable forever, NO eviction/spill/paging anywhere in database/src,
  the WAL never checkpoints so boot replays all history, and durability is one
  process-global WO_DATA so no table can say it matters more than another.
  An allocation failure IS a clean catchable WO_T_OOM — but swap thrash
  arrives first and carries no error signal at all, which is the real hazard
- four new iterations:
  1 measure the ceiling FIRST (curve not cliff; the three exits; kill -9 at
    exhaustion) — every later default should follow from a number
  2 `@table(mode: ram | durable | cold)` — the grammar ask. Small surface
    (Ast.table_cfg gains a key, the parser already rejects unknown args), big
    semantics: `durable` defaults so nothing changes silently, and the
    compiler refuses a durable row holding a `ref` into a ram table
  5 bounded tables + refuse/evict/back-pressure, shedding BEFORE the OS acts
  6 cold tiering — mostly forks, incl. whether the language surfaces the
    fault cost and whether @unique on cold is refused outright. A paged
    B-tree stays rejected: if tiering needs one, reject tiering
- 39 links repointed, link TEXT renumbered to track-local ids; arc gains one
  pointer row replacing the six moved; board + board-views cover three tracks
- linkcheck 0 broken / 0 anchors; no code blocks in any story

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 20:52:48 +02:00

3.5 KiB

track iteration was_language_iteration status
databasev2 7 33 refine

databasev2 7 — WO_DATA=<path>.db: the persistent store as one file

Moved 2026-08-26 from the language track, where this was iteration 33. Part of Story — the database beyond RAM. Content unchanged by the move; its dependencies are restated in that track index.

Format: product/story-iteration-template. Part of Story — one language, one runtime, one database, one binary.

Inserted 2026-08-22 (developer ask: "can the persistent db be in file.db form?"). The truth is already almost there: WO_DATA=<dir> holds exactly ONE file (shard-0.wal) — the entire persistent state, since RAM is authoritative and no data pages exist. This iteration makes the surface say so: point WO_DATA at a file and THAT file is the store. Small, driver-only, independent of the concurrency chain.

Goals

  • WO_DATA=<path> accepts a file path. A path that is not an existing directory is treated as THE wal file (app.db, store.wo.db — the name is the operator's). The directory form stays and keeps meaning <dir>/shard-0.wal — every existing deployment and gate is byte-identical.
  • One file remains the whole truth at any core count — stage 3 made the WAL owner-shard-only (shard 0 is the sole writer), so nothing multi-shard ever adds a second file.
  • The contract says it out loud: 04-db-binding.md documents the file form, and documents honestly that the file is an append-only log that grows until iteration 32 lands.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Given WO_DATA=/tmp/app.db (no such directory), when a program seeds, restarts, and verifies, then replay is byte-true and /tmp/app.db is the only artifact on disk.
  • Given WO_DATA=<dir> (existing directory), when the same program runs, then behavior is byte-identical to today — <dir>/shard-0.wal, every standing gate unchanged.
  • Given the db-bench durability legs pointed at the file form, when the restart proof and kill -9 battery run, then every guarantee holds identically (the file IS the same WAL, only named by the operator).

Out Of Scope

  • A paged database file (SQLite's shape) — RAM is authoritative; the disk story is the WAL, full stop.
  • Checkpoint/compaction — iteration 32's; its rename-swap (write snapshot+tail to a NEW file, fsync, rename() over the old) is exactly what keeps the single-file promise crash-safe when it lands. 33 before or after 32 works; landing 33 first means 32's spec inherits the file form as a stated constraint.
  • Multiple stores per process, attach-by-file — held iteration 20's territory.

Info

  • The whole change is runtime/src/main.c's hardcoded snprintf("%s/shard-0.wal", dir) growing a stat-based fork (directory → today's path; otherwise → the path itself), plus a gate check and the binding-doc note. No engine, no WAL format, no compiler.
  • Fork for the (tiny) spec: what does a NONEXISTENT path mean? Leaning: a path whose parent exists and that does not end in / is a file to create; a trailing / or existing directory keeps the directory form. Refusing ambiguity loudly (WO exit 2) beats guessing.

Proposed Solution

Small enough for a bounded slice: brainstorm the one fork in chat, implement driver + db-bench file-form leg + docs in one pass, gates green. No plan document needed unless it grows.